Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Eugene, Oregon · CCN 385147
26 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 26
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 87
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CASCADIA HEALTHCARE
- County
- Lane
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 45 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oregon.
Last survey on record
May 22, 2026
171 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.1% | 44.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D888.9% | E111.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 30, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address a resident's change in condition, failed to ensure provision of care and services for wounds and failed to follow physicians' orders for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 1, 4, 5 and 11) reviewed for wounds and medications. Resident 11 required acute care intervention due to [CONDITION(S)] (infection that causes life-threatening injury to the body's own tissues and organs) and amputation. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Sep 9, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate RN charge nurse staffing for 15 of 28 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: A review of the facility's Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 10/24/22 through 11/20/22 revealed 15 days with no RN coverage for eight hours each day. On 11/21/22 at 10:56 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the lack of RN staffing.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Sep 9, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate RN charge nurse staffing for 15 of 28 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: A review of the facility's Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 10/24/22 through 11/20/22 revealed 15 days with no RN coverage for eight hours each day. On 11/21/22 at 10:56 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the lack of RN staffing.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584May 22, 2026
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. This placed residents at risk for living in an uncomfortable and un-homelike environment. Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of quadriplegia.On 5/19/26 at 10:11 AM, Resident 38 stated the carpets were stained in several spots and needed to be replaced.On 5/21/26 at 10:12 AM, observation of all facility halls revealed multiple areas of stained and discolored carpeting throughout resident hallways. Large dark stains were observed on the carpeted walking surfaces. Multiple light-colored bleach stains were observed adjacent to resident room doorways. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF732Sep 9, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting was accurate and complete for 12 of 36 sampled days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for lack of staffing information. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Report postings from 8/1/22 through 9/5/22 revealed the following: *Nine days (8/5/22, 8/8/22, 8/26/22, 8/27/22, 8/30/22, 8/31/22, 9/1/22, 9/2/22 and 9/4/22) the actual hours worked by the RN, LPN or CNAs were not documented as required for one or more of the shifts each day. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 22, 2026Standard3 findings
- Jun 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 18, 2025Standard2 findings
- Oct 20, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
- Sep 9, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
- Mar 30, 2022Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 7, 2022Complaint8 findings
- May 25, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
- Feb 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Aug 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 22, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Aug 3, 2018Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- May 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 13, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Aug 8, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Apr 13, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 4, 2015Complaint5 findings
- Mar 5, 2015Standard2 findings
- Feb 14, 2014—6 findings
- Jul 13, 2012—3 findings
- May 31, 2012—2 findings
- Mar 11, 2011—12 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 29, 2010—1 finding
- Jan 28, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction