Crandall Nursing Home
Sebring, Ohio · CCN 365574
16 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 59
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 150
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Mahoning
- Medicare-certified since
- 1982
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 24, 2026
230 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.61 | 3.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.1% | 40.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,870 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G18.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D975.0% | E18.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C18.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6791×
Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Crandall Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 15, 2026
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #54 was safely transferred in a mechanical lift to prevent fall with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 12/15/25 at approximately 1:10 P.M. when Resident #54, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff to transfer, sustained a fall from a mechanical lift device during a staff assisted transfer that resulted in a subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed), which the hospital physician noted had the potential to be a serious and life-threatening condition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 8, 2021
Based on interview, record review, and review of a Self Reported Incident (SRI) the facility failed to ensure resident safety during transport. Actual Harm occurred on 01/29/21 when State tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #300 failed to apply a seat belt during transport and Resident #1 was thrown from his wheelchair when STNA #300 had to stop suddenly. This resulted in a fractured nose, bruises and skin tears to Resident #1. This affected one (Resident #1) of five residents interviewed for safety/falls. (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5). The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. He was taking Eliquis, an anticoagulant which increased the risk of bleeding and bruising. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Mar 20, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of safety data sheets (SDS), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure personal care items, which could cause harm if consumed, were out of reach of residents who were cognitively impaired and residing in the facility's memory care unit. This affected five residents (#6, #7, #49, #58, and #90) and had the potential to affect 19 residents who the facility identified who have cognitive impairment and were independently mobile. The facility identified one resident (#82) who resided on the memory care unit as being immobile. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Mar 24, 2026
Based on resident record reviews, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain dignity while dining. This affected three residents (#85, #88, #93) of three reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 112.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) and had a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severe cognitive impairment.2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Mar 24, 2026
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide ordered mobility interventions for Resident #10. This affected one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 112.Findings include:Record review of Resident #10 revealed he was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with [NAME] bodies, and dementia. Review of his orders revealed one dated 06/20/24 for the resident to wear a foam sleeve to the left thumb as tolerated, to be removed for skin checks and hygiene. The order was both discontinued and reordered on 03/20/26, with the clarification that it was to be done three times per day. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 59 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 24, 2026Standard3 findings
- Jan 15, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 20, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jan 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2022Standard3 findings
- Jul 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Sep 26, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jul 26, 2018Standard9 findings
- May 18, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Standard5 findings
- Dec 11, 2014Standard5 findings
- Sep 6, 2013Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 7, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 21, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction