Deficiency Index

Countryside Health Center

Topeka, Kansas · CCN 17E528

16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
98
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
97
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Shawnee
Medicare-certified since
1982

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2025

558 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day1.863.56
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover38.6%52.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD743.8%E425.0%F531.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 98 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6251×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Countryside Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Apr 30, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and three Certified Medication Aides (CMA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the two CNAs and three CMA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs and CMAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CMA T, hired on 04/18/18, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CMA S, hired on 11/27/20, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Apr 30, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 95 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - On 04/28/25, Administrative Nurse D provided a Facility Assessment updated 01/30/25. A review of the assessment revealed the following: The assessment identified the required staffing needs per day but failed to identify the specific staffing needs by shifts for the weekends. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Apr 30, 2025

    The facility had a census of 95 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report). This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year 2024, all four quarters indicated the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. On 04/29/25 at 09:10 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the weekend staffing was not low. Administrative Nurse D stated that the level of weekend staffing was the same as during the week for direct care staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Aug 15, 2023

    The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for the 87 residents who resided in the facility. This placed the facility and residents at risk for inadequate nurse guidance and decreased quality of care. Findings included: - Review of the Registered Nursing Staffing Schedule for May, June and September 2022, recorded the facility lacked a RN for eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 05/22/22, 05/30/22, 06/04/22, 06/05/22, 06/18/22, 06/19/22 and 09/05/22. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Aug 15, 2023

    The facility had a census of 87 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for the 87 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 87 residents at risk for receiving inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 08/09/23 at 08:32 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB supervising staff in the kitchen. DS BB stated the facility did not have a Dietary Manager and the administrator and director of nursing supervised the dietary department. On 08/14/23 at 09:34 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have a certified dietary manager since the last one quit. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 98 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Aug 15, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Jan 10, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2020Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Nov 13, 2017Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jul 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 5, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Mar 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2015Standard23 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2014Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Feb 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 29, 2013—3 findings
  • Feb 14, 2012—6 findings
  • Jun 7, 2011—2 findings
  • Nov 9, 2010—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction