Corning Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Corning, New York · CCN 335330
23 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 132
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CENTERS HEALTH CARE
- County
- Steuben · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 1, 2024
983 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.20 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.5% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D763.6% | E19.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B218.2% | C19.1% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Corning Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jan 27, 2021
Based on record reviews and interviews during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY 996) conducted on 1/15/21 it was determined for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed the facility did not ensure that its residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #1 did not receive multiple medications, including insulin for diabetes, medications for high blood pressure, ulcerative [MEDICAL CONDITION], and anxiety disorder. Resident #1 did receive multiple medications ordered for Resident #4. Resident #1 was subsequently admitted to the hospital with [REDACTED]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 3, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed to prevent the development and spread of infections for six of six residents reviewed (Residents #5, #31, #33, #72, #86, and #123). Specifically, staff did not follow aseptic technique (practices used to prevent contamination during care) during wound care for Resident #86; staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (an infection prevention strategy requiring gowns and gloves during certain high-contact care activities) for Residents #72 and #123; staff did not remove soiled gloves or perform hand hygiene after providing incontinence care to Resident #5; and a nurse did not perform hand hygiene between medication administration for Residents… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jun 28, 2021
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey(#NY 564 and #NY 509) completed on 6/28/21, it was determined that for five (Residents #2, #4, #10, #11 and #12) of five residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure the services provided by the facility as outlined in the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) met professional standards of quality. Specifically, there was inconsistent documentation that prescribed treatments were administered as ordered on multiple occasions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Aug 3, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent. Specifically, during 33 medication administration opportunities, two medication errors were identified for two of four residents reviewed (Resident #31 and Resident #131), resulting in a medication error rate of 6.06 percent.The findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Administration, last revised December 2019, included medications must be administered according to the orders. The individual administering medications must check the medication label three times to verify the correct dose. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Mar 1, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00328090), it was determined that for one (Resident #93) of two residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the resident was free from significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #93 did not receive an antibiotic medication as ordered by the physician for several days. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy and procedure, Medication Errors, dated August 2019, included that the staff and practitioner should strive to minimize adverse consequences by following relevant clinical guidelines and manufacturer's specifications for use, dose, administration, duration, and monitoring of the medication; defining appropriate indications… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 132 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 3, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 7, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jun 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 27, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 27, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 2, 2018Standard9 findings
- Nov 18, 2016Standard9 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Feb 26, 2016Standard16 findings
- Oct 21, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
- May 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2015Standard and complaint28 findings
- Nov 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 25, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 19, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 4, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 15, 2013—17 findings
- Jun 22, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 1, 2011—9 findings
- May 4, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Belair Care Center IncBellmoreno harm findings
- Emerge Nursing and Rehabilitation at Glen CoveGlen Coveno harm findings
- Excel At Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing,Woodburyno harm findings
- Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at TPainted Postno harm findings
- Sprain Brook Manor RehabScarsdale1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction