Corewell Health Rehab & Nursing Center-Commons Far
Farmington Hills, Michigan · CCN 235462
52 surveys since 2010, 29 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 237
- Surveys
- 52
- Harm or worse
- 29
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 179
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Oakland
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 111 facilities with 128 or more beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Apr 21, 2026
202 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.45 | 4.45 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.07 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.3% | 39.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G48.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3265.3% | E918.4% | F36.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Corewell Health Rehab & Nursing Center-Commons Far, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 25, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safety interventions to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident (R803), of one resident reviewed for falls, resulting in a transfer to the emergency room where it was discovered R803 sustained a left tibia (shin bone) fracture, a contusion (bruise) to the left upper extremity, and an abrasion to the right upper extremity. Findings include: On 2/24/26 at 9:00 AM, a review of a nursing progress note dated 11/29/25 at 12:48 AM entered into the record by Nurse 'E' was reviewed and read, Note Text: Writer was called by caregiver (Certified Nurse Aide 'D') that resident fell to the floor. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF711Feb 25, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review lab values prior to the administration of D5% 0.45% NS (an intravenous fluid solution that contains .45 grams of sodium chloride (NS) and 5 grams of dextrose (sugar) per 100 milliliters) for one resident (R802), of one resident reviewed for the physician's responsibility to review the resident's total program of care at each visit, resulting in R802 receiving continuous IV fluid containing dextrose for approximately two days after the lab reported a critically high glucose level, which subsequently required an emergency transfer to the hospital for hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 14, 2025
This citation pertains to Complaint #2575124.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and implement timely treatment for a shearing injury for two (R801 and R803) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R801 developing an avoidable Stage III (Full-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer that worsened to an Unstageable (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer. Findings include:A review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 6/13/25 and discharged on 7/18/25 with diagnoses that included: spinal stenosis. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 24, 2023
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer techniques were implemented based on the physician order and assessment for one (R907) resident of one reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall, with right intertrochanteric/femoral neck (hip) fracture, right maxillary sinus orbital floor (facial bone) fracture, and right nasal bone fracture which required a transfer to hospital and surgical intervention and pain. Findings include: R907 was a long-term care resident of the facility. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Nov 30, 2022
This citation pertains to intake #MI00131354. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the placement of a transdermal medication patch for blood pressure control for one resident (R272), of one resident reviewed for appropriate use of transdermal patches, resulting in elevated blood pressure and transfer to the hospital for treatment. Findings include: A request was made for a policy regarding transdermal patches, however; the provided policy was specifically written for the use of Fentanyl (narcotic pain medication) patches. The policy provided, did read, .18. […]
Read 45 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 45 of 237 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 21, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Feb 25, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 18, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 14, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 2, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Oct 30, 2024Standard15 findings
- Dec 5, 2023Standard15 findings
- Aug 24, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 44 earlier surveys
- Mar 30, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Nov 30, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- May 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 12, 2021Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2020Complaint4 findings
- May 14, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Dec 19, 2019Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 28, 2019Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 14, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2018Standard and complaint21 findings
- May 14, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 11, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 30, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 7, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 27, 2017Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 21, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 23, 2016Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 8, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 9, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Oct 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jul 2, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 26, 2013—14 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 24, 2012—3 findings · 1 harm
- May 11, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 1, 2011—3 findings
- Sep 29, 2011—1 finding
- Jul 1, 2011—11 findings
- Mar 16, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 1, 2010—3 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction