Copley at Stoughton Nursing Care Center
Stoughton, Massachusetts · CCN 225653
16 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 67
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 123
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Norfolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jan 14, 2026
299 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.27 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.85 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 20.6% | 40.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1359.1% | E418.2% | F14.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B313.6% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7562×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Copley at Stoughton Nursing Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 31, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to 1.) develop and implement care plan interventions related to falls for one Resident (#76) resulting in a fall with injury and 2.) failed to implement a fall care plan for wearing the appropriate footwear for one Resident (#4), out of a total of 21 sampled Residents. Review of the facility's Managing Falls and Fall Risk policy, dated December 2007 indicated: *Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Findings include: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 28, 2022
Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent new ulcers from developing and provide ongoing assessment and treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Specifically, the facility failed to effectively implement the facility's pressure injury prevention policy, ensure timely identification of a deep tissue injury (DTI), and document, monitor, and treat Resident #18's DTI resulting in a worsening of the DTI of the heels. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 8, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #31, who has an indwelling urinary catheter, that staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities); and 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 3, 2025
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that food was labeled and dated in the main kitchen and in three of three unit kitchenette refrigerators. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling, revised July 2014, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Oct 8, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for one Resident (#93), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to act on the consultant pharmacist's recommendation to add a stop date to the Resident's as needed Ativan (an antianxiety medication) order. Findings include: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. Review of Resident #93's medical record indicated he/she was seen by the Consultant Pharmacist in July 2024 and recommendations were made. The surveyor was unable to locate the July 2024 Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation in Resident #93's record. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 67 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2025Standard7 findings
- Oct 8, 2024Standard8 findings
- Jul 31, 2023Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 28, 2022Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Feb 4, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jan 19, 2021Complaint3 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jul 11, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 6, 2018Standard7 findings
- Mar 1, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 31, 2014Standard4 findings
- Jun 7, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 14, 2011—6 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 22, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Life Care Center of the South ShoreScituateno harm findings
- Briarwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterNeedham1 harm finding
- Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterMethuen4 harm findings
- Life Care Center of the North ShoreLynn2 harm findings
- Life Care Center of WilbrahamWilbrahamno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction