Coosa Valley Health and Rehab
Glencoe, Alabama · CCN 015174
13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Etowah
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 29, 2022
1,655 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.05 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.6% | 51.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1982.6% | E14.3% | F28.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6932×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Coosa Valley Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Jan 5, 2023
Based on interviews, record reviews and a review of facility policies titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Controlled Substances, Inventory Control of Controlled Substances and Online Incident Report, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff members were following the facility policy on conducting counts with the exchanging of the cart keys, which resulted in missing medications for Resident Identifier (RI) #4. This deficient practice affected RI #4, one of one resident's who were investigated for missing narcotic medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Apr 29, 2022
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Perineal Care, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to RI (Resident Identifier) #43 in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect RI #43, one of one resident sampled for incontinence care. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, last revised in February of 2018, indicated Purpose The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. RI #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Apr 29, 2022
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #31, had documented medical justification for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice affected RI #31; one of seven residents reviewed for catheter use. Findings included: A review of RI #31's Face Sheet revealed no diagnoses related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of a physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The order lacked information regarding the catheter size to be used or any diagnoses related to the use of the catheter. Review of RI #31's record revealed no documented valid medical justification for the indwelling urinary catheter placement and no indications for its continued use. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Feb 16, 2021
Based on interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1's resident representative was notified of a change in condition requiring a new treatment order on 12/14/2020. This deficient practice affected RI #1, one of five sampled residents reviewed for notifications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised May 2017, revealed the following: .4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: .b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status . 6. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 29, 2022Standard2 findings
- Feb 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2020Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 13, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jul 26, 2018Standard14 findings
- Jun 15, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 4, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jul 8, 2015Standard12 findings
- Sep 5, 2014Standard1 finding
- Sep 6, 2013—6 findings
- Sep 20, 2012—10 findings
- Aug 4, 2011—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction