Continuing Care at Seabrook

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Continuing Care at Seabrook, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Mar 9, 2026

  Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure they reported to the Department of Health (DOH) as required, an allegation of resident- to- resident abuse. Resident #5 had behavior of being aggressive toward staff and other residents. According to the clinical notes dated 8/2/25, Resident #5 threw a shoe at another resident who was sitting in the living room of the facility. The other resident was not identified and the incident was not reported. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5) and was evidenced by the following:On 3/4/26 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed the resident exited a room with multiple stuffed animals and dolls in their hands. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Mar 9, 2026

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of potential resident to resident abuse by a resident who displayed aggressive behaviors toward staff and other residents, when on 8/2/25 Resident #5 threw a shoe at another resident who was sitting in the living room of the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incident/accidents and was evidenced by the following: On 3/4/26 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 independently ambulating and was exiting another resident's room. Resident #5 was also observed holding multiple stuffed animals and dolls in their hands. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF849Mar 9, 2026

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that consistent communication between the facility and the hospice provider occurred for the coordination of resident care. This deficient practice was identified for one 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care (Resident #35) and the deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/4/26 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #35 seated in a recliner and was non-verbal. The surveyor then reviewed the electronic and paper medical record for Resident #35. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Sep 12, 2024

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all eligible residents were educated and offered the pneumococcal vaccination (vaccine) to prevent incidence of pneumonia. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #23 and Resident #40), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/8/24 at 10:44 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #40 in the activity room sleeping upright in their wheelchair. On 9/9/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #40. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Aug 31, 2023

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility policy was followed to identify and adequately monitor target behaviors for residents receiving psychoactive drug therapy for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #27 and #33) reviewed for use of psychoactive medication use. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 08/22/23 at 10:05 AM during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #27 sitting in the room and a visitor was at the bedside. The surveyor knocked on the door and was prompted by the visitor to enter the room. The surveyor explained the purpose of the visit to both the resident and the visitor. […]