Colville Tribal Convalescent C
Nespelem, Washington · CCN 505412
33 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 146
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 44
- Ownership
- Government - Federal
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Okanogan · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jun 26, 2026
136 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.71 | 4.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.93 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 61.0% | 48.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,173 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1770.8% | E625.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F8512×
Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
- F5521×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Colville Tribal Convalescent C, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 21, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide two staff supervision required for transfers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents. Resident 1 experienced harm when they sustained a painful inoperatable right femur (thigh bone) fracture after a staff assisted fall. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Protocol, showed the facility would minimize risk for injury from preventable falls by assessing residents for fall risk and care planning safety interventions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 10, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the COVID-19 Focused Infection Control (FIC) survey, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases, infections, and COVID-19 (a highly contagious [CONDITION(S)] illness), for 28 at-risk residents on wings 1, 2 and 3, reviewed for facility personal protective equipment (PPE) use. Specifically, staff were not wearing their PPE per guidelines during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility, putting staff and residents at risk for exposure to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 26, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was not stored on the floor, hand hygiene was performed when indicated during the lunch meal service, food was served at the appropriate temperatures, expired foods were discarded, and donated food were dated when received in 1 of 1 dry storage areas and 1 of 2 refrigerators (refrigerator 1). The facility further failed to ensure the microwave and oven were clean. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and food served from unsanitary conditions.Findings included . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Apr 3, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures during 1 meal service observed. This failure put residents at risk of decreased enjoyment of their meals, and possible reduced dietary intake. Findings included . According to [NAME] Administrative Code [PHONE NUMBER]0, time/temperature control for safety of food, hot and cold holding (FDA Food Code 3-501.16), food must be maintained: At 135 F (57 C) or above, or at 41 F (5 C) or less. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 3, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, expired foods were not discarded for 1 of 2 refrigerators, 1 of 1 dry storage areas, and food items in the refrigerator and freezer were not dated when opened. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . During an initial tour of the kitchen on [DATE] at 8:41 AM, the dry storage area revealed a can of bean sprouts that expired on [DATE], eight packages of nonfat dry milk that expired on [DATE], six boxes of corn starch that expired on [DATE] and a box of couscous that expired on [DATE]. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 146 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 26, 2026Standard5 findings
- Apr 3, 2025Standard7 findings
- Sep 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 30, 2024Standard4 findings
- Feb 21, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2023Standard6 findings
- Aug 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Feb 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 16, 2019Standard18 findings
- Oct 10, 2018Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 8, 2017Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- May 3, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jan 27, 2017Standard and complaint26 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 29, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 28, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
- Dec 4, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 28, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 9, 2014Standard7 findings
- Feb 5, 2014—1 finding
- Sep 6, 2013—5 findings
- Aug 3, 2012—4 findings
- Jul 19, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- May 17, 2011—10 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 11, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction