Deficiency Index

Colonial Nursing Home

Crown Point, Indiana · CCN 155733

29 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
163
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
55
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP
County
Lake
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 60 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Jun 2, 2025

525 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.833.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.13—
Annual nurse turnover59.0%40.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2674.3%E720.0%F12.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.9%
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 163 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F9123×

    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

  • F9213×

    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Colonial Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Oct 29, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented, including those to prevent and/or contain COVID-19, related to not monitoring to make sure Agency Nursing staff were being tested for COVID-19 per the county positivity rate and tested for COVID-19 before and after the facility's outbreak started. The facility was unaware of any testing results of the Agency Staff who had been tested prior and after the outbreak occurred. The facility also failed to notify the Agency staff who worked in the facility prior to the outbreak and the Staffing Agency of the outbreak, which places the Agency staff, the facility and other facilities where the staff work at risk. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF887Oct 29, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccination was offered to all residents of the facility, related to 2 of 40 residents who were not offered the COVID-19 vaccine after admission. (Residents D and E) Both residents have now tested positive for COVID-19. Resident D had the first positive COVID-19 test on 10/17/21 after presenting with a non-productive cough with diminished lung sounds and was transferred to the emergency room for [CONDITION(S)]. Resident E tested positive on 10/18/21. There are now 35 COVID-19 positive residents, of which 6 have been hospitalized , with 3 of those 6 residents remaining in the hospital, and 13 COVID-19 positive staff in the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 10, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer assessments were completed at least weekly to determine the healing status of the pressure ulcers. Two of the pressure ulcers deteriorated, a surgical debridement was completed, and new treatment orders were received for the deterioration of the pressure ulcers when assessed by the Wound Physician, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents C & D) Findings include: 1) During an observation on 1/10/22 at 10:09 a.m. with RN 1, Resident C was lying in bed with her head of the bed elevated. There was a heel protector boot on the right heel. RN 1 indicated the facility Wound Nurse works part time and the Wound Physician consulted on the pressure ulcers weekly. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 2, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to testing the dishwasher sanitation level with faulty test strips in 1 of 1 kitchens observed (Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect the 26 of 29 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Finding includes: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/27/25 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), the dishwasher was observed and noted to be a low temperature, chemical system. The DFM obtained a testing strip, dipped it into the dishwasher water and compared it to the results on the side of the testing strip container. The strip did not have a readily discernable color change. He indicated they always used those strips and was unsure why they were not changing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF912Jun 2, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (SQ FT) per resident in multiple resident rooms and 100 SQ FT in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 8 of 30 resident rooms in the facility. (Rooms 101, 104, 111, 201, 202, 204, 206, and 208) Findings include: 1. The floor area of the following single resident room measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 96.2 SQ FT. NF. 2. The floor areas of the following multiple resident rooms measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 residents, 150.3 SQ FT, 75.2 SQ FT per bed. NF. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 145.0 SQ FT, 72.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 149.0 SQ FT, 74.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. d. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 163 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 2, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Mar 18, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 23, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Feb 21, 2023Complaint9 findings
  • Dec 16, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • May 10, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Jan 10, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 29, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Mar 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Dec 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 6, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Aug 18, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Dec 29, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 24, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Mar 25, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 25, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013—11 findings
  • May 13, 2013—10 findings · 2 harm
  • May 31, 2012—9 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—8 findings
  • Sep 20, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction