Colonial Gardens Nursing Home
Pico Rivera, California · CCN 555715
49 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 249
- Surveys
- 49
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 2, 2026
221 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.25 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.42 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.6% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $36,700 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J10.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G10.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6863.6% | E2220.6% | F1110.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B43.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F65610×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6896×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6095×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F8805×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5804×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Colonial Gardens Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF925Aug 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent and eradicate (destroy) cockroach infestation (presence of an unusually large number of cockroaches [small insect that can carry and spread infectious diseases]) in the facility's kitchen where food was prepared for 92 of 92 residents. The deficient practice resulted in 92 of 92 residents in the facility to have the potential to experience food infection from ingesting food containing toxins from bacteria, and disease transmission from vector-borne (illness that results from infections transmitted to humans by insects such as cockroaches) that can lead to life threating complications and death. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Feb 10, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to address the rashes noted on seven of seven residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). The facility failed to ensure all seven residents, who were exhibiting symptoms of suspected scabies (a contagious, intensely itchy skin condition caused by a tiny, burrowing mite), were provided with necessary care and treatment, and placed on contact precautions (intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents). On 1/25/2023, the facility identified an additional 36 of 88 residents with rashes. The facility failed to: a. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 13, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Assess the elopement (to leave unnoticed) risk for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who attempted to elope from the facility on 4/30/2024 and 5/23/2024 and was assessed on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment and care-screening tool) as having wandering behaviors (when a person leaves a safe area or caregiver, which can be a risk to their safety, also called elopement), per the care plan. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 24, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) after two fall incidents. 1. Resident 2 fell on [DATE] (first fall), the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan, failed to reassess the resident's fall risk, ensure the resident's wheelchair alarm was functional, and failed to ensure an interdisciplinary team (IDT, group of different disciplines working together towards a common goal for a resident) meeting was held post fall. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF604Apr 8, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) of 10 sampled residents (Residents 84, 36, 345, and 80) were free from physical restraints, by not ensuring: 1. Assessments were completed prior to applying the physical restraints. 2. Adequate monitoring and periodic release of the physical restraints to ensure adequate blood circulation and skin integrity. 3. Development and implementation of care plans addressing the use of physical restraints. 4. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 249 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Apr 2, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 16, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Feb 18, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 14, 2025Complaint3 findings
Show the 41 earlier surveys
- Aug 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 6, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Jun 24, 2025Complaint4 findings
- May 22, 2025Standard18 findings
- Apr 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Nov 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 13, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Aug 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2024Standard27 findings
- Sep 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Apr 8, 2022Standard and complaint25 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 22, 2019Standard17 findings
- May 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 12, 2018Standard18 findings
- Aug 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2017Standard10 findings
- Dec 15, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jun 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2015Standard18 findings
- May 13, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 12, 2014Standard11 findings
- Mar 16, 2013—11 findings
- Sep 7, 2012—13 findings
- May 24, 2011—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction