Deficiency Index

College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Sacramento, California · CCN 056158

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
66
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Sacramento
Medicare-certified since
1970

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.

Last survey on record

May 29, 2026

164 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.334.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.81—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%37.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,814 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.0%K—L—
Actual harmG14.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1664.0%E624.0%F14.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 66 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6282×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF627Nov 20, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge was provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was not permitted admission to the facility upon return from a day leave and was discharged to her car.This failure resulted in Resident 1's unanticipated discharge and homelessness with no resources, medical care, or information on how to file an appeal.On 10/23/25 at 1:52 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ, a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) was identified in the presence of the facility's Administrator (Admin). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF685Feb 9, 2024

    Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #72) of 2 residents reviewed for vision services received treatment to maintain vision abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain an ophthalmology appointment for the treatment of cataracts for Resident #72, who requested multiple times to be seen by a specialist for treatment. This failure resulted in Resident #72's vision worsening. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Referrals, Social Services, revised in December 2008, revealed, Social services personnel shall coordinate most resident referrals with outside agencies. The policy revealed, 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served in a sanitary manner for a census of 112 when:1.Three bags of food were found unsealed in the freezer, and 2.There was a large buildup of black residue on the inside door jam of the walk-in refrigerator .These failures present a potential risk of foodborne illnesses for residents eating facility prepared meals.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/6/26 at 8:12 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Feb 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medication when: 1. There was a discrepancy between the Controlled Drug Record (CDR-inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) and medication blister card (medcard-a type of medication packaging) for Resident 76, Resident 151 and Resident 17. 2. A bottle of morphine sulfate solution (controlled medication [medication with high potential for abuse or addiction] to relieve pain) was not reconciled properly. These failures resulted in the facility not having an accurate accountability of controlled medications, and the potential for abuse or misuse of these medications. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Feb 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was not less than 5% when the error rate was 17.86% based on five medication errors out of 28 opportunities observed during a medication pass observation for three out of six residents (Resident 7, Resident 204 and Resident 351). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders or manufacturer's specifications and had the potential to affect the resident's clinical conditions. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 7:29 a.m. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 66 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 7, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Oct 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Oct 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Oct 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 3, 2017Standard2 findings
  • May 22, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Feb 4, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Jun 6, 2013—6 findings
  • Jul 12, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction