Deficiency Index

Coastal Health and Rehabilitation Center

Daytona Beach, Florida · CCN 105565

20 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
63
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ASTON HEALTH
County
Volusia
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 11, 2025

424 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1386.7%E—F213.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 15 of the 63 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6281×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Coastal Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF849May 18, 2023

    Based on interviews, facility policy review, the facility's hospice contract review, and medical record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure residents receiving hospice services had evidence of medical record communication with the hospice provider for seven (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #4, #100, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services, 2) Ensure evidence of signed contracts for services in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for six (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #101, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services, and 3) Designate a facility hospice coordinator for eight (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #4, #101, #100, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2021

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, that included labeling and dating food food items, and thawing food in a safe and sanitary manner, placing the residents at risk of exposure to food-bourne illnesses. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 9/7/21 at 9:20 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). During the tour, an opened package of what the CDM identified as chicken patties was observed in the freezer wrapped in cellophane but not labeled or dated. The CDM stated, I will take care of that and removed the package. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 5, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards by failing to keep nourishment room refrigerators clean; document refrigerator temperatures daily in the nourishment rooms; date food items in nourishment room refrigerators; and discard expired food items. This deficient practice could potentially affect all residents receiving food or drinks from the facility's nourishment rooms. The findings include: During a tour of the nourishment room on the north hall on [DATE] at 8:11 am, the following concerns were observed: - Refrigerator had yellow dried stain on bottom of refrigerator. - Open container of thickened lemon water with no date. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Sep 11, 2025

    Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's Transfer and Discharges policy, the facility failed to notify resident/responsible parties in writing of discharges and transfers, and omitted required information including the date of and the reason for the transfer, the location to which the resident was being transferred, a statement of appeal rights, information about the appeal process, and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman contact information for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility also failed to provide a copy to the local Ombudsman office.The findings include:A closed record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 6/21/25 and a discharge from the facility on 7/20/25. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jun 14, 2024

    Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of facility standards and guidelines for elopement and wandering, the facility failed to immediately report, or within 24 hours of the event, an alleged violation of neglect for one (Resident #2) of two residents sampled for elopement, to the State Survey Agency. The findings include: Review of the facility's 2024 Federal Reports revealed no reports had been filed electronically as required for Resident #2. A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and left the faciity on [DATE]. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 63 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Oct 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Sep 19, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2019Complaint4 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jan 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 24, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Apr 17, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Mar 21, 2013—4 findings
  • Dec 15, 2011—5 findings
  • Jun 6, 2011—3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction