Coal Creek Post Acute & Assisted Living
Lafayette, Colorado · CCN 065414
20 surveys since 2015. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 69
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Boulder
- Medicare-certified since
- 2015
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Jun 3, 2026
159 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.64 | 3.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.06 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 62.2% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1773.9% | E417.4% | F14.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5504×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Coal Creek Post Acute & Assisted Living, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Feb 14, 2022
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services necessary to prevent the formation of pressure ulcers and the worsening of existing pressure ulcers, for three (#1, #7 and #12) of four residents reviewed for wounds, out of 12 sample residents. The facility failed to prevent, assess, monitor and timely treat a facility acquired sacral pressure injury for Resident #1, who had been assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcers. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the physician of changes to the pressure injury, including signs of infection. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 11, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent accidents and hazards for one (#5) of three residents reviewed for falls out of 23 sample residents. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after pacemaker placement on 4/27/26 due to episodes of sinus pauses (a brief moment when the natural pacemaker of your heart, the sinus node, stops sending electrical signals for a short time), difficulty walking and progressive dementia. Upon admission to the facility, Resident #5 was assessed to be at a high fall risk. The baseline care plan, initiated 4/29/26, documented the resident was confused and very forgetful. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 13, 2024
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from accident hazards and adequate supervision was provided for one (#3) of three residents reviewed out of nine sample residents. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation after surgery on her back. Upon admission, the resident was assessed for fall risk and was identified as a high risk for falls. However, the baseline care plan, initiated on 10/11/24, failed to identify the resident was at risk for falls and person-centered interventions were not put in place to prevent falls for Resident #3. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF867Feb 14, 2022
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to: -Identify and address concerns related to wound care; -Notify the physician timely of changes in wounds and of injuries; and, -Identify infection control concerns with wound care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 15, 2021
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent neglect for one (#5) of three residents reviewed for injuries out of 25 sample residents. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 reported to therapy on 1/4/21 she had a fall on 1/3/21 and she had increased back/hip pain. The facility neglected to complete a thorough investigation after she reported she had fallen which included the causation of her increased complaint of pain and decreased mobility (cross-reference F610 for failure to complete a thorough investigation). […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 69 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 11, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2025Standard5 findings
- Nov 13, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 29, 2024Standard6 findings
- Sep 27, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Apr 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 14, 2022Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Mar 15, 2021Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 1, 2020Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 25, 2019Standard7 findings
- Nov 29, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jul 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 18, 2017Standard3 findings
- Mar 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2016Standard and complaint2 findings
- Dec 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction