Cliffside Rehab & Residential Health Care Center
Flushing, New York · CCN 335349
11 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 31
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 218
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Queens
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 23, 2025
474 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.07 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.1% | 33.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D562.5% | E225.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B112.5% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cliffside Rehab & Residential Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF604Jul 23, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/16/2025 to 07/23/2025, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical restraints for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was evident for 5 (Residents #29, 142, #206, #125, and #3) of 8 residents reviewed for physical restraints out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Residents #29, 142, #206, #125, and #3 were observed on multiple occasions in bed with both upper and lower half side rails raised on both sides. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Jul 23, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/16/2025 to 07/23/2025, the facility failed to ensure that residents admitted with a limited Range of Motion and/or mobility, are provided services and/or treatment to increase range of motion/mobility and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion/mobility, including the provision of equipment for limited mobility. This was evident for 2 (Residents # 20 and #85) of 4 residents reviewed for Position Mobility/Limited Range of Motion, out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #20 and #85, who had contractures, were observed without hand rolls as ordered by the physician to improve the residents' contractures. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jul 23, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/16/2025 to 07/23/2025, the facility failed to ensure residents are provided comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident for 1 (Unit1) of 3 resident units observed. Specifically, Resident #93's room appeared cluttered and disorderly, with lack of storage for resident's items. The findings include but are not limited to: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #93 had intact cognition, had no behaviors, and had impairment on both upper extremities. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640May 16, 2023
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey 5/9/23 to 5/16/23, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were electronically transmitted to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (Resident #108 and #144) of 4 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment out of a sample size of 35 residents. Specifically, the MDS assessments for Resident #108 and #144 were not submitted and transmitted within 14 days of the completion date. The findings are: The CMS RAI Version 3.0 Manual (Dated October 2018), documented the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641May 16, 2023
Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/9/23 to 5/16/23, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. This was evident for 2 (Resident #112 and #23)of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the MDS assessment for Resident #112 did not document the resident's dialysis treatment, and 2) the MDS assessment for Resident #23 did not document the resident's Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) status. The findings are: The facility policy titled Assessments, Comprehensive (Minimum Data Set 3.0) dated 8/2022 documented the MDS is inclusive to all pertinent issues for the resident. 1) Resident #112 had diagnoses of anemia and coronary artery disease. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 31 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 23, 2025Standard4 findings
- May 16, 2023Standard4 findings
- Jan 31, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jan 5, 2016Standard1 finding
- Dec 5, 2014Standard4 findings
- Oct 31, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 12, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Nov 15, 2013—2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Dec 5, 2012—5 findings
- Dec 12, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 18, 2010—3 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Eastchester Rehabilitation and Health Care CenterBronxno harm findings
- Bridge View Nursing HomeWhitestoneno harm findings
- Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care IncJamaica1 harm finding
- Sea Crest Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBrooklynno harm findings
- Leroy Village Green Residential Health C F, IncLeroyno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction