Clarewood House Extended Care Center
Houston, Texas · CCN 676021
15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 60
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 30, 2026
102 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | 4.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.00 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E116.7% | F116.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Clarewood House Extended Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF921May 22, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for safe environment. The facility failed to ensure the lock for the emergency exit door was functioning correctly resulting in an armed intruder gaining access into the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/19/2023. While the IJ was removed on 05/22/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and severity of potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate due to the facility's need to complete evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 3, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was prepare, distributed, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure that equipment was clean. The facility failed to ensure that plates, bowls, and cups with dried food particles, and glasses with water spots and stains were not stored with clean plates, bowls and glasses.The facility failed to ensure that menu items on the steam table were maintained at 135 degrees F and above.-The facility failed to ensure that cooked poultry in the walk-in cooler was at the correct holding temperature of 41 degrees F and below.-The facility failed to ensure that pans with food particles on them were not stored with clean pans. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Aug 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility for 6 of 6 anonymous residents reviewed for resident council. Six residents in a confidential resident group interview were unaware that meeting minutes were created prior to their participation in the group meeting for the month of August 2023. This failure placed 6 residents that frequently would attend meetings, and that could participate in a Resident Council, at risk of not having the right to voice their concerns in a Resident Council meeting. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Jun 23, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week were used for 8 out of 54 days reviewed for RN coverage. Days not covered 05/7/2022, 05/8/2022, 05/21/2022, 05/22/2022, 06/4/2022, 06/5/2022, 06/18/2022, 06/19/2022. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage for 8 hours a day/7days a week. Days not covered 05/7/2022, 05/8/2022, 05/21/2022, 05/22/2022, 06/4/2022, 06/5/2022, 06/18/2022, 06/19/2022. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Mar 18, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents who are incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents ( Resident#35 and 33) reviewed for incontinent care, in that; CNA #A did not separate Resident #35's labia to clean during incontinent and catheter care and did not perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove changes throughout the care. Resident #33's catheter was not secured to prevent it from pulling at the insertion site. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 60 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2025Standard2 findings
- Sep 12, 2024Standard1 finding
- Aug 17, 2023Standard2 findings
- May 22, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 23, 2022Standard3 findings
- Mar 18, 2021Standard2 findings
- Jun 27, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Jun 8, 2017Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- May 5, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 9, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jun 26, 2014Standard6 findings
- May 3, 2013—4 findings
- Apr 19, 2012—9 findings
- Apr 5, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction