Deficiency Index

Clarence Care Center

Clarence, Missouri · CCN 265599

17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
94
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Shelby · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 113 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Jan 29, 2026

284 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.153.62
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%39.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD936.0%E936.0%F416.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C28.0%
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 94 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Clarence Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF744Jan 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #3), in a sample of eight residents, with appropriate care and services to promote the highest possible level of functioning and well being for a resident with dementia, by recognizing and thoroughly addressing the resident's mental and psychosocial needs. The facility did not attempt gradual dose reductions to ensure the resident was on the lowest amount of medication possible, did not document attempts at finding the root cause of behaviors, or evaluate and attempt new interventions, did not provide adequate monitoring of the resident to prevent the resident from leaving the building, from having falls inside and outside the facility (falling in a ditch), or wandering in and out of… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF744Jan 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #3), in a sample of eight residents, with appropriate care and services to promote the highest possible level of functioning and well being for a resident with dementia, by recognizing and thoroughly addressing the resident's mental and psychosocial needs. The facility did not attempt gradual dose reductions to ensure the resident was on the lowest amount of medication possible, did not document attempts at finding the root cause of behaviors, or evaluate and attempt new interventions, did not provide adequate monitoring of the resident to prevent the resident from leaving the building, from having falls inside and outside the facility (falling in a ditch), or wandering in and out of… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 1, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3), in a review of nine sampled residents, was free from intimidation and physical abuse when a staff member insisted the resident change his/her shirt, there became a struggle, and the staff hit the resident in the groin. The resident was upset, angry and tearful when discussing the incident two days after it occurred. The resident expressed he was fearful and afraid to go to sleep while the staff member worked in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine, the range hood and the ceiling vents were free of a buildup of debris and failed to ensure staff wore beard restraints during beverage preparation and clean dishware handling. The facility census was 31. 1. Review of the Dietary Sanitation Evaluation, dated 11/14/25, conducted by the consultant dietitian, showed the ice machine was not clean. Observation on 1/27/26 at 9:35 A.M. showed the ice machine in the dining room had a heavy buildup of black debris in the upper corners inside the unit over the accumulated ice below. Black debris located in the upper right-hand corner was in direct contact with the accumulated ice that had not yet fallen into the storage bin. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff failed to ensure foods were stored per the manufacturer's instructions and failed to ensure conduct proper handwashing, hairnet usage, and surface sanitization practices. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Receiving and Storage, revised 11/2022, showed the following: -Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; -Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean and temperature/humidity-appropriate food storage areas at all times; -Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHF) and Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS)… […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 94 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 29, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 25, 2024Standard17 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 1, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • May 27, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Apr 4, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 5, 2018Standard7 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Sep 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 27, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 8, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Apr 15, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jun 18, 2014Standard7 findings
  • May 22, 2013—9 findings
  • Jun 6, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 6, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction