Deficiency Index

Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Lockhart, Texas · CCN 675053

33 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
129
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE
County
Caldwell
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 164 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 14, 2026

118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.723.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.50—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$37,541 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K13.8%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1661.5%E934.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 129 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Aug 31, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to reinstate Resident #1's wound treatment orders after she was readmitted from the hospital on 07/11/24 until 07/16/24. Her wounds worsened and a new pressure injury was acquired during that timeframe. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/30/24 at 1:44 PM. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF697Aug 23, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preference for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to consistently and accurately monitor Resident #3's pain levels beginning 05/25/2026 until she was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 08/04/2026 Resident #3's nursing note by LVN B reflected that she was in pain. Resident #3's increased pain was documented in nursing notes by RN A, RN B, and LVN C. Resident #3 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] when she was in excruciating pain and diagnosed with bilateral sacral fractures. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF726Aug 23, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services by failing to appropriately assess, manage, and respond to acute, extreme levels of pain for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure nurses caring for Resident #3 accurately documented her long-term pain levels in PCC (electronic health record). After a fall on 07/13/2026 a nursing note by LVN B dated 08/04/2026 reflected Resident #3 began complaining of pain. Nurses' notes reflected that Resident #3's pain increased and her ADLs declined. Resident #3 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and diagnosed with bilateral sacral fractures. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jul 14, 2026

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for use of mechanical lifts. The facility failed to ensure mechanical lifts were always operated by two staff members during transfer of residents for Resident #3 on 04/17/2026 (by CNA A) and 06/14/2026 (by CNA B). This failure placed residents at risk of injury.Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #3 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Aug 7, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in experimental research, and to formulate advance directives for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #1, #4 and #65) reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's out of hospital DNR was uploaded to the electronic health record and the care plan was updated.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4's out of hospital DNR was signed by the physician and uploaded to the electronic health record on [DATE].The facility failed to ensure that Resident #65's out of hospital DNR was signed by the physician and uploaded to the electronic health record on [DATE]. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 129 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 23, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 7, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jul 11, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Apr 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jul 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Jun 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Sep 14, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Mar 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2017Standard16 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Mar 9, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 12, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 9, 2015Standard12 findings
  • Mar 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Mar 13, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 19, 2014—1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2013—8 findings
  • Apr 19, 2012—3 findings
  • Nov 16, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 18, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction