Deficiency Index

Cherry Brook Health Care Center

Canton, Connecticut · CCN 075396

25 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
107
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Capitol
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 53 facilities of 100–127 beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

Jul 27, 2026

105 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.594.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.45—
Annual nurse turnover55.4%31.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$11,175 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2170.0%E516.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B26.7%C13.3%
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 107 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cherry Brook Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF805Jun 8, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documentation, for one resident reviewed for choking, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had a diagnosis of dysphagia received a diet that was consistent with speech therapy recommendations and physicians orders, and failed to ensure that the resident who had a choking episode was not given foods prior physician approval and a speech therapy evaluation, and further failed to ensure that Resident #1 did not receive foods that were listed as an allergy, and for three (3) out of ten (10) residents with a diagnosis of dysphagia, (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) the facility failed to ensure that the residents received meals in accordance to physician's orders, resulting in… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 28, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow physician orders which directed the assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility which resulted in a dislocation of the left shoulder, and for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed provide adequate supervision by failing to initiate appropriate fall prevention interventions (toileting plan/schedule) and failing to implement an established care plan intervention (gripper socks) for a resident with progressive incontinence patters who was at high risk for falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jul 27, 2026

    Based on observation, temperature test, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served at appetizing and pallatible temperatures. The findings include: Interview with Resident #91 on 7/20/26 at 10:45 AM identified the meals are served late and are cold Interview with Resident #66 on 7/21/26 at 12:39 AM identified the food is cold and sits on a cart in the hallway for 25 minutes before they bring it into my room.On 7/21/26 at 12:39 PM observation of posted mealtimes identified meal schedules as follows: Breakfast at 8:00 AM, Lunch at 12:00 PM and Dinner at 5:00 PMObservation and temperature testing of the tray line on 7/23/26 at 11:45 AM identified the meal consisting of spaghetti and meatballs or chicken parmesan, mashed potatoes, and Caeser salad. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 27, 2026

    Based on tour of the dietary department, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated, expired food items were discarded, staff food was not stored in resident nourishment areas, and food was held in ovens in safe containers. The findings include: A tour of the Dietary Department with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 7/20/26 at 10:15 AM identified the following:1a. A stack of fresh salads plated and covered in plastic wrap, an opened box of cooked chicken breast (about 15 pieces), and hamburger patties, were on a shelf in the refrigerator undated. The FSD indicated that the salads were made each morning and thrown away at the end of the day and that anything open should be dated. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 27, 2026

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for urinary catheter, the facility failed to ensure the urine collection bag was not lying on the ground and for resident bathrooms/rooms on the third floor, failed to ensure personal care items were properly labeled, covered, stored according to facility policy for resident bathrooms/rooms on the third floor. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure there was an appropriate system preventing, identifying, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases according to standards for infection control related to surveillance/tracking, identification of upticks in infections, outbreak management for COVID-19, management of undiagnosed respiratory illness, and… […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 107 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 27, 2026Standard and complaint24 findings
  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 23, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Dec 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Aug 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Jul 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Sep 15, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 27, 2016Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Nov 6, 2014Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 2, 2013—1 finding
  • May 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2012—9 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 11, 2011—3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction