Deficiency Index

Chapin Home for the Aging

Jamaica, New York · CCN 335631

10 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
27
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
220
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Queens
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 10, 2024

790 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.193.67
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.24—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD990.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C110.0%
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 27 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chapin Home for the Aging, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Sep 10, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification survey between 09/03/2024 and 09/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that needed services, care and equipment are provided to assure that resident with limited range of motion and mobility maintain or improve function based on the residents' clinical condition. Specifically, a resident with an order to apply shrinker to left knee was observed with no device as per Physician's order. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for Limited Range of Motion, (Resident #96) out of 32 sampled residents, The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure for .Equipment/Devices and Nursing Rehab Program dated 08/2014, documented: .Upon assessment, the Rehab team will provide recommendations for necessary skilled… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 10, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00343925) from 09/03/2024 to 09/10/2024, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #139 & Resident #140) investigated for Accidents, out of an investigative sample of 32 residents. Specifically, on 05/31/2024 at 4:45 PM, (Resident #139 & Resident #140) left the facility unannounced. Video footage dated 5/31/24 revealed that Residents #139 & Resident#140 left the unit via dietary elevator ground floor at 06:17PM and exited the back door at 06:19PM. They walked to the side of the building, then out of the gate to the backyard. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 5, 2022

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents were involved in developing their comprehensive care plan (CCP) with the interdisciplinary team (IDT). This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 33 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #66 was not invited to several CCP meetings conducted The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP last revised 1/15/2022 documented the facility must develop and implement a CCPs for each resident consistent with the resident rights. If the facility determines that the inclusion of the resident and/or resident representative is not practicable, documentation of the reasons, including the steps the facility took must be included in the resident's medical record. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Sep 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/03/2024- 09/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that Nurse Staffing was posted appropriately. Specifically, the posting of daily nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent area which was readily accessible to residents and visitors. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Nurse Staffing Coverage Plan dated 9/11/2009 and last revised on 5/16/2024 documents; daily nursing schedules will be posted on the nursing supervisor door along with daily nursing data sheet which is readily accessible to residents, visitors and staff. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 27 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 10, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 5, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Jun 4, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 30, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2012—8 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2011—3 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction