Center for Living & Rehabilitation
Bennington, Vermont · CCN 475029
38 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 130
- Surveys
- 38
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 145
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Bennington · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 22 for-profit facilities in Vermont.
Last survey on record
Jul 13, 2026
119 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.45 | 3.96 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.6% | 60.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $134,672 across 2 penalties
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2672.2% | E719.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F5572×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6922×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Center for Living & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 13, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). For Resident #1, who was at high risk for falls and required supervision while walking, staff failed to implement person-centered care plan interventions after multiple falls, ensure the resident was care planned for adequate supervision, and ensure staff assigned to care for residents in those rooms had the ability to provide the required supervision. On 6/30/26, Resident #1 experienced an unwitnessed fall and was found on the floor unresponsive and passed away on 7/01/26 from injuries sustained from the fall. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Dec 16, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from physical and verbal abuse from another resident for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility did not implement effective interventions to prevent recurrence after a prior altercation on 8/7/25, nor did it update care plans to address ongoing risk. On 9/17/25, Resident #1 sustained blunt trauma to the nose with bleeding after being struck by Resident #2 during a physical altercation, and Resident #1 expressed feeling unsafe and distressed in his/her home. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm and psychosocial harm. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF657Dec 16, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) after significant changes in condition related to two resident-to-resident altercations. Despite an initial incident on 8/7/25 and a subsequent altercation on 9/17/25 resulting in Resident #1 sustaining blunt trauma to the nose and expressing fear and distress, the facility did not update either resident's care plan or Kardex to include interventions to prevent recurrence, such as separation or monitoring. Staff interviews confirmed reliance on informal redirection rather than documented interventions. This failure resulted in actual physical harm and psychosocial harm to Resident #1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 16, 2022
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving enteral feedings maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 1 resident [Res. #67] of 1 residents receiving tube feedings. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Res. #67 reveals the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Res. #67's Care Plan reveals the resident was identified as having 'a PEG tube due to [CONDITION(S)]' [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is a procedure to place a feeding tube, called PEG tubes]. Review of Res. #67's Minimum Data Sheet [MDS] Quarterly Review, dated 1/5/22, under Sec. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF693Feb 16, 2022
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services for 1 resident [Res. #67] of 1 residents receiving tube feedings. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Res. #67 reveals the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Res. #67's Care Plan reveals the resident was identified as having 'a PEG tube due to [CONDITION(S)]' [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is a procedure to place a feeding tube, called PEG tubes]. Review of Res. #67's Minimum Data Sheet [MDS] Quarterly Review, dated 1/5/22, under Sec. K: Swallowing and Nutritional Status lists Res. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 130 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 13, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2026Standard1 finding
- Dec 30, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Dec 16, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 30, 2025Standard6 findings
- Feb 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 30 earlier surveys
- Feb 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
- Sep 25, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Mar 2, 2023Standard8 findings
- Feb 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 16, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 14, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 6, 2018Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jul 18, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Jun 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2016Standard8 findings
- Oct 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 15, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jul 21, 2014Complaint5 findings
- Mar 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 13, 2013—9 findings · 5 harm
- Nov 6, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 3, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 23, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 2, 2012—3 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 8, 2011—2 findings
- Dec 7, 2011—5 findings
- Oct 12, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 3, 2011—1 finding
- Jun 1, 2011—3 findings
- Jan 12, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction