Deficiency Index

Cedar Crest Health Center

Janesville, Wisconsin · CCN 525649

12 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Rock
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 12, 2025

635 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.454.33
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover41.2%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD480.0%E—F120.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cedar Crest Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 58 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed multiple staff wearing hairnets incorrectly. Surveyor observed staff not wearing a beard restraint. Surveyor observed staff enter the kitchenette area while the cook was serving food, not wearing hairnets. The facility policy, Meal Service Delivery from Unit Kitchens, dated February 2025, states, in part; .Hair Restraints .Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Feb 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that self-administration of medications was determined to be clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 residents (R32). R32 was observed with an inhaler sitting on his bedside table. R32 did not have an order to self-administer medications, nor did he have an assessment completed to determine his competency for self-administering medications. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2001, revision date April 2019, states, in part: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed . 27. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF849Feb 12, 2025

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure coordination of care and the hospice communication process was followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R61) and 2 of 2 supplemental residents (R55 and R320) for hospice services. R61, R55, and R320 were admitted to hospice services and the facility failed to obtain hospice documentation. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Hospice Program dated 7/2017 states in part .12. Our facility has designated Social Services to coordinate care provided to the resident by our facility staff and the hospice staff .He or she is responsible for the following: d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 7, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving misappropriation are reported immediately to other officials including the State Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for misappropriation. The facility became aware of an allegation of misappropriation for R1 on 7/14/23. The allegation was not reported to the State Agency within 24 hours. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, with an effective date of 2/15/17, states, in part: .d. Misappropriation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Aug 7, 2023

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an alleged misappropriation was thoroughly investigated and the results of the investigation were reported to the State Agency within five working days of the incident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation (R1). The facility was made aware of an allegation of misappropriation for R1. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into this allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, with an effective date of 2/15/17, states, in part: .d. Misappropriation. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 12, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Aug 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Mar 21, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Dec 7, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 21, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Nov 14, 2013—6 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Dec 18, 2012Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 13, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 23, 2012—6 findings
  • Jun 23, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction