Cedar Creek Health Campus
Lowell, Indiana · CCN 155822
27 surveys since 2014, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 95
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Lake
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 60 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
May 18, 2026
175 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.58 | 3.58 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.90 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 27.1% | 40.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,021 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2392.0% | E14.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cedar Creek Health Campus, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 5, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to a cognitively impaired resident with a history of exit seeking and failed to ensure an alarmed door was effectively secured to prevent elopement for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for elopement risk. (Resident M) This deficient practice resulted in Resident M exiting the facility and being picked up by a stranger who activated 911. The immediate jeopardy began on 5/25/24 when a cognitively impaired male resident, with a history of exit seeking and a Wanderguard (door alarm bracelet used to monitor residents who wander) in place, exited the facility without staff knowledge and ambulated 0.3 miles away from the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 22, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed in a sanitary manner related to an uncovered ice bowl in the main dining room. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents in the facility who received beverages with ice from the main dining room. Finding includes: On 5/16/23 at 3:05 p.m., the ice machine in the main dining room was observed. There was a note taped to the ice dispenser that indicated to use the ice in the bowl on the counter. Observed on the counter was an uncovered stainless steel bowl of ice with the ice scoop laying directly on top of the ice. Staff and residents were scooping ice into glasses. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF809Jan 21, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served with no more than 14 hours between an evening meal and breakfast the following day for 1 of 2 meals observed. This had the potential to affect all 11 residents that ate in the VIP Dining Room. Finding includes: During a tour of the kitchen on 1/21/25 at 8:21 a.m., the Director of Food Services (DFS) indicated breakfast was served from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and was open dining. There were breakfast trays being served to the Main Dining Room at the time. During an observation of the breakfast meal service on 1/21/25 at 9:27 a.m., Assistant Director of Food Services (ADFS) delivered meal trays to resident's rooms. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 13, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse/misappropriation was reported to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) and other proper authorities related to an allegation of drug diversion by facility staff for 1 of 1 misappropriation allegation reviewed. (RN 1)Finding includes:A facility investigation of an allegation of drug diversion, dated 7/12/26 and received from the Executive Director (ED), was reviewed on 8/12/26 at 10:00 a.m. The initial statement indicated RN 2 had made an allegation RN 1 was taking controlled narcotics from the facility residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641May 18, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to insulin for 1 of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 15)Finding includes:Record review for Resident 15 was completed on 5/12/26 at 3:16 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus.The admission MDS assessment, dated 3/17/26, indicated the resident had received an insulin injection in the past seven days.The Medication Administration Record, dated 3/2026, lacked documentation of any insulin administration.The Physician's Order Summary, dated 5/2026, lacked any orders for insulin.During an interview on 5/13/26 at 3:05 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the resident had not received any insulin and it had… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 95 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 18, 2026Standard6 findings
- Jun 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jan 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 3, 2024Standard5 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Jan 4, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 22, 2023Standard7 findings
- Mar 7, 2022Standard5 findings
- Jul 19, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 16, 2019Standard4 findings
- Aug 17, 2018Standard8 findings
- Jun 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Jun 9, 2017Standard3 findings
- May 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2016Standard7 findings
- Mar 31, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Oct 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 29, 2015Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 12, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Jul 9, 2014Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Waters of Chesterfield Skilled Nursing FacilityChesterfield1 harm finding
- Hickory Creek at CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsvilleno harm findings
- Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Hauteno harm findings
- Aperion Care MonroeBloomingtonno harm findings
- Waters of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction