Deficiency Index

Carroll Park Healthcare

Baltimore, Maryland · CCN 215085

36 surveys since 2010, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
331
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
9
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ENGAGE HEALTHCARE
County
Baltimore City
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Jun 30, 2026

132 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.323.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.57—
Annual nurse turnover49.4%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$306,550 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ32.3%K21.5%L—
Actual harmG32.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD7758.8%E3929.8%F64.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B10.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 131 of the 331 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6585×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6574×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Carroll Park Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Nov 20, 2023

    Based on review of medical records, facility policies, facility investigation reports, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1. Assess known smokers on admission, re-assess residents deemed as safe smokers after they were found to be unsafely smoking, and adequately supervise residents while smoking. 2. Failed to prevent a Resident with documented unsafe use of smoking material from having smoking material in their room. 3. Failed to ensure that a resident's room was free from hazards. This was evident for 8 of 27 residents reviewed for smoking/accidents. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF867Nov 20, 2023

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to track, review, and analyze serious preventable adverse events (SPAE drug overdoses). The first identified occurrence was on [DATE] (Resident #131) which resulted in resident death. Without effective QAPI intervention, 22 additional drug overdose SPAEs occurred (Residents #2, #53, #58, #63, #66, #76, #90, #93, #101, #118, #132, #136, #147, #149, #154, #160, #267, #268, #269, #373, #418, and #420). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Nov 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for a resident with a full code status. This was evident for 1 resident (# 266) out of 1 reviewed for CPR initiation. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 3:00 PM on [DATE]. The facility provided a plan to remove the immediacy while the surveyors were onsite. The removal plan was accepted by the OHCQ at 7:55 P.M. on [DATE]. The findings include: According to the American Heart Association (AHA) Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF740Nov 20, 2023

    Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy records, review of a facility's program description, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility: (1) failed to timely implement physician instructions and orders related to SUD treatment, and (2) failed to effectively plan care for residents with Substance Abuse Disorder (SUD) and (3) failed to initiate a Substance Use Disorder care plan for Residents identified with Substance Use Disorders. This was evident for 5 (Residents #147, #90, #101, #141 & #154) of 18 residents reviewed for Substance Use Disorder during survey. These failures contributed to resident overdoses and placed residents at increased risk for serious harm and possible death. The findings include: 1. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF626Nov 9, 2021

    Based on a review of the medical record and other pertinent documentation and interviews facility staff, a resident, and hospital staff, it was determined the facility failed to honor a resident's right to return to the facility following the resident's stabilization and treatment after an emergency petition (EP); a decision that was based on the resident's mental state at the time of the EP and the resident's history of incarceration. The facility further failed to evaluate the same resident and determine their ability to meet the resident's needs. This was found to be evident for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for transfers during a complaint survey conducted at the facility. […]

Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 331 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 30, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 24, 2026Complaint6 findings
  • May 15, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2025Standard8 findings
  • May 14, 2025Complaint10 findings
  • Nov 20, 2023Standard and complaint48 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 23, 2022Complaint6 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Nov 9, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2019Standard and complaint50 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 11, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2018Standard and complaint32 findings
  • Jun 25, 2018Complaint8 findings
  • May 25, 2018Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 1, 2018Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 14, 2017Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 24, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 26, 2016Standard and complaint22 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 24, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • May 21, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 12, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jan 7, 2015Complaint9 findings
  • May 9, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2013—15 findings
  • Jul 23, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2013—10 findings
  • Oct 4, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 21, 2012Standard5 findings
  • Aug 10, 2011—6 findings
  • May 31, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 2, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction