Deficiency Index

Carolina Village Inc

Hendersonville, North Carolina · CCN 345123

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
24
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
58
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Henderson
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 24, 2025

654 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.255.15
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.43—
Annual nurse turnover22.2%32.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD133.3%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B133.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 24 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Carolina Village Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 24, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove food items past the date indicated for use in the walk-in refrigerator. This practice occurred in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator and had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: An observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 01/21/25 at 9:22 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed the following: 1 a. A five pound container of sour cream dated 1/13 that had been opened and was available for use. During an interview on 01/21/25 at 9:22 AM the CDM revealed the date on the container was the date the sour cream was opened and she expected it to be discarded on 1/20/25, seven days after being in use. The CDM removed the container of sour cream from the walk-in refrigerator. c. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 4, 2022

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date food items in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and 1of 1 walk-in freezer. This practice had the potential to affect the food served to residents. The findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen was made on 8/1/2022 at 11:13 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following problems were observed in the walk-in cooler: 1 opened and used pack of honey smoked turkey breast with no label and no date 1/2 pack of opened and used corn beef with no label and no date 1/2 container of opened and used thousand island dressing with no date 1/4 carton of opened and used milk with no date An observation of the walk-in freezer was made on 8/1/2022 at 11:18 AM with the DM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF867Aug 4, 2022

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions previously put in place following the recertification survey of 8/04/22. This was for one deficiency cited during the 8/04/22 survey and subsequently recited on the 9/21/22 survey. The repeated deficiency was in the area of Food Safety Requirements. The facility's continued failure during two federal surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF867Aug 4, 2022

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions previously put in place following the recertification survey of 8/04/22. This was for one deficiency cited during the 8/04/22 survey and subsequently recited on the 9/21/22 survey. The repeated deficiency was in the area of Food Safety Requirements. The facility's continued failure during two federal surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Jan 24, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to assess the ability of a resident to self-administer medications and supplements for 1 of 1 resident with medication observed in the room (Resident #3). Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility 12/12/24 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed no documentation that Resident #3 was assessed for self-administration of medications or supplements. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 24 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 24, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Oct 13, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard6 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jun 14, 2012—1 finding
  • May 20, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction