Caring House
Sacaton, Arizona · CCN 035216
19 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 144
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- Government - Federal
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Pinal
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- —
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 facilities of 100–127 beds in Arizona.
Last survey on record
Sep 18, 2025
417 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $28,695 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J16.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D956.3% | E637.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5761×
Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Caring House, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 18, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and follow its elopement policy for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for supervision. This failure resulted in R1 remaining alone outdoors for approximately 4 hours in extreme heat conditions (100 Fahrenheit (F) - 111 F, with a heat index of up to 114 F). (Heat index is defined as a measurement that combines air temperature and relative humidity to determine how hot the air actually feels to the human body.) The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for heat exhaustion, heat stroke, and/or death and resulted in a situation of immediate jeopardy.On [DATE] at 5:30 PM the Administrator and Assistant Administrator were notified of an Immediate Jeopardy determination for [DATE] for 42… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Nov 8, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, review of the [NAME] Drug Guide, and review of records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide services to manage the pain for one of two residents sampled for pain (Resident [R]46) consistent with professional standards, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically: 1) Staff did not follow facility policy and procedures for assessment and recognition of R46's pain failing to identify location, intensity, frequency, pattern, and severity for each reported pain occurrence. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Sep 4, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required written discharge/transfer notification was provided for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R91 and R2) reviewed for discharge and hospitalization, respectively. The facility failed to: (1) provide R91 with written notice of the discharge and did not provide a copy of the discharge notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and (2) provide the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman with a copy of R2's transfer notice following R2's transfer to the hospital. These failures resulted in R91 not receiving written information regarding the reason for discharge, effective date, discharge location, appeal rights, and information regarding the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 4, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure food and dishware were maintained under safe and sanitary conditions when the facility failed to: (1) ensure cleaned bowls were adequately dried and were not stored with standing water; (2) maintain a unit refrigerator at 41 F or below; and (3) ensure opened food items were appropriately dated and food items past their expiration date were removed from 2 of 3 unit refrigerators/freezers (Unit E and Unit F) reviewed. These failures placed all 86 residents who received meals prepared by the kitchen at risk for food-borne illness. Findings: During an interview on 8/31/26 at 8:55 am Food Services Director FSD stated that all residents in the facility received their meals from the kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 4, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Water Management Program when water temperatures were repeatedly below the facility-established control limits for Unit B, one of four units reviewed, and corrective actions were not implemented when monitoring results fell outside the established control limits.This deficient practice had the potential to create conditions conducive to the growth and transmission of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens, placing residents on Unit B at risk for waterborne illness. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Program policy, revised May 2026, revealed the facility was committed to the prevention, detection, and control of waterborne contaminants, including Legionella. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 144 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 4, 2026Standard6 findings
- Sep 18, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 25, 2025Standard5 findings
- Nov 8, 2024Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2023Standard4 findings
- Nov 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 12, 2022Standard4 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- May 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 2, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
- Sep 11, 2020Standard7 findings
- Mar 15, 2019Standard8 findings
- Jun 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2017Standard19 findings · 4 harm
- Sep 15, 2016Standard and complaint16 findings
- Oct 31, 2014Standard23 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 16, 2013—16 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 29, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction