Deficiency Index

Care and Rehab - Cumberland

Cumberland, Wisconsin · CCN 525712

15 surveys since 2013, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
56
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2013–2026
’13’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CARE & REHAB
County
Barron · rural
Medicare-certified since
2013

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Feb 18, 2026

264 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.563.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.93—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%45.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2191.3%E14.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 56 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Care and Rehab - Cumberland, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R32) received care consistently with professional standards of practice to prevent further deterioration and promote healing of an existing PI. R32 was at risk for PI development. The facility failed to provide adequate and consistent wound care treatments, did not complete comprehensive weekly assessment, and did not notify provider of new PI.Findings include: R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic aortic insufficiency, hypertensive heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, unilateral osteoarthritis left ankle and foot, hypertension, weakness, and presence of right artificial… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jul 7, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure controlled medications were administered under professional standards of clinical practices for residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5). R1, R2, R3, and R4 had narcotic medications, in which the facility did not ensure accurate documentation on the narcotic sheets. R5 has Lorazepam, which is a controlled substance, needing a double lock. The medication was not double locked. Findings include: On 07/07/25 at 12:25 PM, Surveyor observed medication cart on 200-300 hall with Registered Nurse (RN) C. Surveyor observed R1, R2, R3 and R4's narcotic sheets to have discrepancies. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF605Feb 18, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility must ensure each resident is free from unnecessary medications as evidenced by completing adequate behavioral monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (R7 and R16) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings:Facility policy titled, PSYCHOTOPIC MEDICATIONS, revised 1/26, stated in part: 6. The specific targeted behaviors for which the drug is being administered will be entered by the nurse on the behavior monitoring record. The effectiveness of the psychotropic drug will be documented on the behavior sheet each shift. Total occurrences may be based on the personal observation or the observation of other staff members 8. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Feb 18, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide the proper discharge documentation for 2 of 2 residents (R44 and R4) reviewed for discharge.Facility did not have bed hold or notice of transfer documentation for R44.Facility did not have Ombudsman notification and notice of transfer documentation for R4.Findings:Example 1R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13/15, which indicated R44 was cognitively intact. R44 had Minimum Data Set (MDS) stating 'Discharge Return Anticipated' dated on 01/14/26 and 12/21/25.On 02/18/26 at 9:13 AM, Surveyor was unable to find a bed hold for discharge date of 01/14/26 and a notice of transfer form. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Feb 18, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II screen for R1, who has a serious mental disorder and is taking psychotropic medication to treat symptoms of major mental disorder to ensure he received care and services to meet his needs. The facility practice affected 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed (R1).Findings include:Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 56 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 18, 2026Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Sep 7, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Aug 10, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jun 10, 2021Standard1 finding
  • May 15, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard3 findings
  • May 18, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 26, 2016Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 15, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Apr 11, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction