Deficiency Index

Canfield Healthcare Center

Youngstown, Ohio · CCN 365972

29 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
153
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
COMMUNICARE HEALTH
County
Mahoning
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Sep 24, 2025

411 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.053.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover55.2%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$149,318 across 2 penalties
Special focus
SFF Candidate
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ35.6%K—L—
Actual harmG11.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3564.8%E23.7%F1120.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C23.7%
CMS’s current file: 54 of the 153 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6004×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Canfield Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 24, 2025

    Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), observation of recorded video, review of a police report, interviews and review of the facility abuse policy, the facility failed to protect Resident #66's right to be free from physical abuse by Housekeeper #582. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 09/16/25 at approximately 11:15 A.M. when Housekeeper #582 physically abused Resident #66. Housekeeper #582 pushed Resident #66 in his wheelchair causing the resident to fall out of the wheelchair and hit his head on the nurse's medication cart. Housekeeper #582 was then observed by (staff) witnesses and per the resident to put his hand around Resident #66's neck and punch the resident with a closed fist. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF627Sep 17, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-report incident, facility investigation review, police report review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or intervention to prevent resident elopement. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm beginning on 05/24/25 when Resident #13, who was assessed as an elopement risk, had exit seeking behaviors and was deemed incompetent by the court system, was permitted by staff to leave the facility unattended and without guardian consent. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was returned to the facility via police escort on this same date. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 17, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-report incident, facility investigation review, police report review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or intervention to prevent resident elopement. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm beginning on 05/24/25 when Resident #13, who was assessed as an elopement risk, had exit seeking behaviors and was deemed incompetent by the court system, was permitted by staff to leave the facility unattended and without guardian consent. The resident's whereabouts were unknown until the resident was returned to the facility via police escort on this same date. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Sep 29, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, review of controlled drug administration records, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program, including assessment/monitoring of pain and administration of narcotic pain medication (Percocet) to meet Resident #45's needs and prevent severe pain. Actual harm occurred on 09/18/23 when as needed (PRN) Percocet 5-325 milligrams (mg) was not available to administer to Resident #45 as requested and as ordered by the physician. On 09/18/23 at 10:21 A.M. Resident #45 rated her pain level an eight on a scale of zero (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Resident #45 was administered a dose of Percocet on 09/19/23 at 12:23 P.M. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 19, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, and interview the facility failed to implement adequate interventions to prevent the development of bilateral deep tissue injury pressure ulcers to Resident #46's bilateral heels. The facility also failed to implement a treatment timely following the identification of the ulcers. Actual harm occurred on 09/22/22 when Resident #46, who had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two person staff assistance for bed mobility, was found to have bilateral deep tissue injuries (defined as persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration, intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue) to both heels… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 153 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 24, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2025Standard and complaint22 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2023Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 14, 2022Complaint5 findings
  • Nov 4, 2021Complaint8 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Oct 21, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 16, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Oct 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 10, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Aug 20, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 22, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 14, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jun 9, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2013—12 findings
  • Jan 25, 2013—2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2012—11 findings
  • Jan 26, 2012—1 finding
  • May 13, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction