Deficiency Index

Campbell Hall Rehabilitation Center Inc

Campbell Hall, New York · CCN 335657

33 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
196
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
134
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1982

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Dec 10, 2025

334 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.033.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover48.5%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$149,221 across 15 penalties
Special focus
SFF Candidate
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L11.5%
Actual harmG23.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3856.7%E1623.9%F913.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.5%C—
CMS’s current file: 67 of the 196 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6103×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Campbell Hall Rehabilitation Center Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF689Dec 22, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification, abbreviated (NY00359302), and extended surveys from 12/15/2024 to 12/22/2024, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents related to smoking for 6 of 6 residents (#2, #6, #9, #29, #41 and #54) identified as smokers. Specifically, Resident #41 was a known smoker in a non-smoking facility and the facility failed to complete safety assessments or develop and implement a plan of care to ensure their safety, when it was known that the resident continued to smoke outside of the facility. On 11/1/2024 a fire was started on the outside patio when Resident #41 threw a cigarette butt into dry leaves. There were no facility staff supervising the resident during this smoking activity. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 10, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure that one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident # 106) reviewed for pressure ulcers received the necessary care and services to promote healing. Specifically, Resident #106 who was dependent for bed mobility was identified as having a Stage 2 pressure on the sacrum during an assessment by Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 on 10/16/2025. A wound consult was ordered which was not initiated until 11/05/2025. There was no documented evidence of wound assessments from 10/16/2025 to 11/05/2025. The first wound consult identified two (2) Stage 3 pressure ulcers on the right and left buttock. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 22, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00340632, NY00340457) the facility did not ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1(Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 4/28/2024 at 5:45 AM Resident #1 is seen on video surveillance walking with their cane and pushed open the locked inner lobby door with their body. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was seen coming from outside the facility, passed through the outer lobby door and pushed the inner lobby door against Resident #1, which caused Resident #1 to fall to the floor. Subsequently, Resident #1 sustained a bloody nose, black right eye, and a bruised left ankle. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Dec 10, 2025

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (2622355, 2622747) the facility did not ensure that sufficient staff was available to meet the needs of all residents. Specifically, actual staffing levels were below facility assessment desired levels on eleven of ninety shifts as documented on the daily staffing sheets. Residents remained in bed and did not receive showers as planned (See F677) and were not available for activities (See F679). Interviews with staff, residents and family members reported low staffing and care not being completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Aug 5, 2025

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification from 7/29/25 to 8/5/25, the facility did not ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the staffing schedule from 6/27/25 through 8/4/25 documented the facility did not consistently provide adequate staffing on all units/shifts to meet the needs of the residents on 34 of the 39 days reviewed. The findings included: The Facility Wide Assessment updated 5/23/25 documented: Day shift and evening shifts one registered nurse weekdays and weekends, five licensed practical nurses weekdays and four weekends, twelve certified nurse aides weekdays and ten weekends. […]

Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 196 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 10, 2025Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 5, 2025Standard and complaint24 findings
  • Apr 29, 2025Complaint6 findings
  • Dec 22, 2024Standard and complaint19 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 22, 2024Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 18, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • May 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Nov 22, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2021Standard14 findings
  • Mar 19, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2020Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 12, 2020Infection control6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Jul 17, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Jul 26, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Sep 14, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Mar 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jan 5, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 4, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Aug 7, 2013—2 findings
  • May 23, 2013—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2012—10 findings
  • Dec 22, 2011—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 14, 2011—5 findings
  • Aug 16, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction