Camden Postacute Care, Inc
Campbell, California · CCN 555838
73 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 264
- Surveys
- 73
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS
- County
- Santa Clara
- Medicare-certified since
- 2006
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.84 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.25 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.6% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3071.4% | E37.1% | F37.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B511.9% | C12.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F9113×
Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
- F9123×
Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6272×
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
- F6602×
Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Camden Postacute Care, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 16, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1 One can of grape juice in the dry storage room was dented and was not removed to prevent use; and 2. One pack of open cereal with no date when it was opened and no expiration date; 3. Refrigerator #2 had the following: 12 pieces of tomatoes inside a plastic bag container, three pieces of carrots inside a plastic bag, four pieces of white onions inside a plastic bag, 2 bunches of lettuce inside a plastic bag and one bunch of celery inside a plastic bag were not labeled and no date when it was delivered to the facility; and 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 21, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1. Dietary staff did not cover their hair completely with a hairnet; 2. The uncleaned fan blew air directly onto the clean meal trays, plates, plate covers and food preparation area (area to prepare for hot food); 3. There were opened liquid eggs stored with other food items in the refrigerator; 4. Toaster had multi-colored substances; 5. The can opener had multi-colored substances; 6. Kitchen staff did not correctly check the sanitizer concentration level; 7. Dietary manager (DM) did not wash his hands or perform the hand hygiene when he was in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness for the residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 21, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper infection control practices when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not follow infection control practice during residents' wound treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] 2. The janitor/Housekeeper did not know the environmental disinfectant contain time (wet time, disinfectant maintain wet on the surface in order to kill the micro-organism) when cleaning the resident's room; 3. The facility did not implement the effective infection control practice when Resident 8 refused to do the wound treatment and shared the room with four residents; 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 5, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection prevention practices when: 1. One housekeeper (HK) did not follow proper infection control practices when cleaning a resident room. 2. Spray bottles containing disinfectants were unlabeled.; 3. There was a lack of policy and uniformity in HK's practice of diluting and using disinfectant and cleaning agents for resident rooms and environmental cleaning; and 4. The automated dispenser for the cleaning agent was not working for an unknown period of time. These failures had the potential for an unsanitary environment and in contacting COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019, a new respiratory infectious disease) to residents and staff. Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578May 16, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney [ a document that authorizes to act on behalf of resident] for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) for six of 8 sampled residents (Resident 10, 13,18,19,27, and 37). This failure could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services against sampled residents' goals and wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 10's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 10 was admitted to facility on 10/24/24. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 264 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2025Standard and complaint19 findings
- May 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jan 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 65 earlier surveys
- Jul 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2021Standard and complaint13 findings
- May 14, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jan 5, 2021Infection control1 finding
- May 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 6, 2020Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Oct 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Mar 7, 2019Standard and complaint25 findings · 4 harm
- Feb 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 12, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Oct 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2018Standard and complaint17 findings
- Apr 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 9, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
- May 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Aug 16, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jul 18, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Jul 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 9, 2016Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jun 7, 2016Complaint4 findings
- Jun 2, 2016Complaint3 findings
- May 24, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 18, 2016Complaint5 findings
- May 17, 2016Complaint8 findings
- Mar 16, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Dec 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2015Standard4 findings
- May 27, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jan 6, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 4, 2014Standard13 findings
- Jun 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2013—15 findings
- Nov 1, 2012—8 findings
- May 22, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 14, 2011—3 findings
- Apr 27, 2011—1 finding
- Dec 21, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction