Cambridge Care Center
Lakewood, Colorado · CCN 065296
22 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 90
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 110
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jefferson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 48 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.90 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.8% | 44.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,151 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1359.1% | E836.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6602×
Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
- F6852×
Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cambridge Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF622Apr 2, 2024
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a facility-initiated discharge procedure for non-payment was followed for one (#140) of three residents reviewed for discharge out of 34 sample residents. Resident #140, who had a diagnosis of urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), type II diabetes mellitus, history of falling, depression and anxiety disorder, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. The facility failed to provide preparations for a safe and orderly facility-initiated discharge for non payment. The resident chose not to transition to long term care (LTC) insurance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 11, 2026
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on two of four units.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate infection control procedures when cleaning and disinfecting residents' rooms and high-frequency touched areas (call lights, door handles, light switches and bed controls); and,-Ensure housekeeping staff followed disinfectant dwell times (the amount of time required to ensure germs are eliminated) when cleaning residents' rooms.Findings include:I. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jun 17, 2025
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#8, #6 and #1) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 12 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #9 from physical abuse by Resident #2; -Protect Resident #6 from physical abuse by Resident #2; and, -Protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Incident of physical abuse by Resident #2 towards Resident #8 on 1/30/25 A. Facility investigation The facility investigation, dated 1/30/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/17/25 at 11:45 a.m. The investigation revealed the following: On 1/30/25 Resident #2 pushed Resident #8 in the coffee area of the dining room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF742Dec 15, 2022
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#2, #9, #65 and #76) of seven out of 22 sample residents who displayed or was diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to provide mental health services for Residents #2, #9, #65 and #76. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Behavioral Health Services policy and procedure, revised February 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/15/22 at 12:13 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Dec 15, 2022
Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures for all residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in temperature. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #29 was interviewed on 12/12/22 at 1:36 p.m. He said the temperature of his meals were always cold. He said sometimes staff would reheat his food, but not always. Resident #39 ws interviewed on 12/12/22 at 2:05 p.m. She stated the temperature of the food was never good. She said hot foods were cold and cold foods were hot. Resident #76 was interviewed on 12/12/22 at 2:40 p.m. He said the food was often terrible. He said the food was frequently served cold. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 90 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jun 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 2, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2022Standard6 findings
- Sep 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- May 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 24, 2019Standard3 findings
- Feb 14, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2018Standard2 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 18, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 31, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Nov 24, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jun 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2014Standard15 findings
- Jun 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2013—9 findings
- Dec 21, 2012—8 findings
- Feb 2, 2012—7 findings
- Jun 17, 2010—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction