Brushy Creek Post Acute
Greer, South Carolina · CCN 425004
25 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 144
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Greenville
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in South Carolina.
Last survey on record
Dec 23, 2025
321 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.61 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.5% | 43.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $19,933 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J212.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D956.3% | E425.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C16.3% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Brushy Creek Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Dec 23, 2025
Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility neglected to provide services and care to Resident (R)1. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor and provide medications as ordered by the physician, resulting in R1 suffering a hypertensive crisis.On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations could cause psychosocial harm.On [DATE] at 1:15 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Dec 23, 2025
Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated to Resident (R)1, Specifically, not responding in a timely manner and initiating CPR per the physician's order.On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations could cause psychosocial harm. On [DATE] at 1:15 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of [DATE]. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.24-Quality of Life.On [DATE], the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Dec 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 3 (Residents (R)10, R51, and R127) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a total sample of 31. The facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring had occurred for R10's use of an antipsychotic medication. In addition, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications had a stop date in excess of 14 days. These failures placed the residents at risk of having unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated February 2025 revealed, . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 12, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for 1 (Resident (R)36) and to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 residents (R115 and R105) in a total sample of 31. These failures placed the residents at risk for cross-contamination and/or worsening health concerns.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated December 2024 revealed, . Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jun 15, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment was provided for 3 (Resident (R)1, R2 and R3) of 3 sampled residents whose rooms and common areas were reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to properly clean resident rooms and common areas and failed to follow their Homelike Environment policy. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Homelike Environment revised in 02/21 stated, Resident are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 23, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 12, 2025Standard5 findings
- Oct 31, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- May 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Apr 11, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Sep 14, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- May 21, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jan 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 21, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Jun 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 1, 2018Standard9 findings
- Aug 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 1, 2016Standard6 findings
- Dec 16, 2015Standard2 findings
- Feb 10, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 4, 2014Standard and complaint7 findings
- May 1, 2013—2 findings
- Jun 20, 2012—8 findings
- Jan 17, 2012—3 findings
- May 18, 2011—15 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—1 finding
- Feb 14, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction