Browns Valley Health Center
Browns Valley, Minnesota · CCN 245564
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 31
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Traverse · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 21, 2026
202 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.19 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.91 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.0% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $26,685 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J111.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D555.6% | E111.1% | F222.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Browns Valley Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 4, 2026
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident (R1) from abuse when nurse aid (NA)-B physically and verbally abused R1 during cares. This resulted in serious psychosocial harm for R1 who became withdrawn, had a decreased appetite, and increased crying following the incident. The IJ began on 2/21/26 at 7:45 p.m., when NA-B was witnessed to make derogatory statements, used foul and aggressive language, and slapped R1 on the backside. NA-B was not removed from shift and continued to work with R1 and other vulnerable residents despite an internal report being made. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 3/4/25 at 1:00 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints in the kitchen. Further, the facility failed to ensure food and beverages stored in the refrigerators, were labeled, dated and discarded properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 28 residents who received food and beverages from the refrigerators and the kitchen. Findings include: Hair nets: On 3/10/25 at 12:02 p.m., dietary manager (DM) was standing at the dishwasher pulling clean dishes out of the dishwasher. DM hair was approximately 1/4 inch in length and was not wearing any type of a hair restraint. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Apr 17, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for licensed practical nursing staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarters reviewed (Quarter 1), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 10, 2021
Based on observation, interview and document review, food was not served in a sanitary and clean manner for 33 residents who resided in the facility, observed during dining observation. In addition, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination for 33 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine. Findings include: Food Service On 6/7/21, at 5:33 p.m. dietary cook (DC)-A was observed applying gloves to his left hand or both hands during each time he plated a residents meal on the plates for service. At 5:35 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 12, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to disinfect a multi-use glucometer( a machine that is used for blood glucose monitoring) after use for 2 of 2 residents (R11, R6) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all 9 residents who required blood glucose monitoring. Findings include: The Centers for disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Infection Prevention for Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration dated 2/6/2013, identified due to the risk of transmitting infectious diseases during assisted blood glucose (blood sugar) monitoring whenever possible, blood glucose meters should not be shared. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 21, 2026Standard1 finding
- Mar 4, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2025Standard3 findings
- Apr 17, 2024Standard2 findings
- Mar 29, 2023Standard1 finding
- Oct 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 10, 2021Standard6 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Dec 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 6, 2019Standard6 findings
- Feb 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 16, 2018Standard3 findings
- Sep 22, 2017Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 6, 2016Standard1 finding
- Aug 21, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 11, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 2, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction