Brentwood Place Three
Dallas, Texas · CCN 675352
33 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 95
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
- County
- Dallas
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 3, 2026
159 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.58 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.4% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1666.7% | E729.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Brentwood Place Three, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 6, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised when Resident #1 left the faciity on [DATE] and climbed through the fence and walked blocks away from the facility. Resident #1 contacted 911 and was transported to a nearby hospital. Resident #1 was located at a nearby hospital after the previous SW had called around to the closest hospital trying to find Resident #1. Staff did not know what time he left but were aware of his exit-seeking behavior and previous elopement attempt from the facility.An IJ was identified on 02/05/2026. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jul 22, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one kitchen. A. During confidential interviews, eight residents voiced concerned of cold food, flavor and/or texture and one resident that was not a confidential interview. B. Eight of the 12 foods sampled on the meal tray had temperature issues. C. Three of the 12 foods sampled on the meal tray had flavor issues. D. Two of the 12 foods sampled on the meal tray had texture issues. These failures affected three of three forms produced in the facility (regular, mechanical chopped and pureed) and could result in a decline in resident consumption of food and cause resident unwanted weight loss. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 22, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; in that: Cook D and DM C cleaned the thermometer probe with the same paper towel in between taking temperatures of the different food items on the steam table. These failures could result in the cross contamination and spread of foodborne illness in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/21/19 at 12:20 PM, Cook D took the temperature of food on the steam table before serving residents and she used the same paper towel in wiping the thermometer probe in between food temperatures. An interview with Cook D was not appropriate at the time due to lateness of the serving of the meal. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Mar 19, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the Resident Council group a private space for monthly resident council meetings for the facility's only resident council, for 18 of 18 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure resident council meetings were held in a private meeting space during their monthly scheduled March Resident Council meeting, when staff continued to enter the dining room while the resident council meeting was being held. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 19, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety.1. The facility failed to ensure the stand-by freezer food items were dated and labeled.2. The facility failed to ensure the stand-by refrigerator food items were dated, labeled, and sealed.3. The facility failed to ensure that serving utensils were used when handling food items.These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and foodborne intoxication.Findings included:During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 8:48 a.m. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 95 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 3, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2026Standard6 findings
- Feb 6, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
- Nov 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jun 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2023Infection control4 findings
- Sep 27, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
- May 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 2, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jul 22, 2021Standard6 findings
- Jun 17, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Sep 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 18, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jun 27, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 31, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
- Oct 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2017Standard3 findings
- May 29, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- May 8, 2015Standard1 finding
- May 22, 2014Standard3 findings
- May 22, 2013—4 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—4 findings · 4 harm
- May 4, 2012—7 findings
- Jan 10, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 29, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction