Deficiency Index

Breckinridge Place

Morganfield, Kentucky · CCN 185465

10 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2023
’11’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
24
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Union · rural
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 20, 2023

1,208 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.085.77
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.01—
Annual nurse turnover35.3%40.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG250.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD125.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Breckinridge Place, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Apr 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan was implemented for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #17). The facility care planned Resident #17 to require extensive assistance of two (2) staff for turning, repositioning, and bed mobility. However, on 02/21/2022, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provided incontinent care for Resident #17 alone, and without the care planned assistance of two (2) staff members. During the provision of incontinent care by only CNA #1, Resident #17 rolled off the bed and was observed as bleeding from his/her face. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents (Resident #17). The facility assessed and care planned Resident #17 to be at risk for falls and to require the assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility and incontinent care. However, on 02/21/2022 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provided incontinent care to the resident without the assistance of another staff member as per the care plan. As a result, Resident #17 rolled off the side of the bed during the incontinent care provided by CNA #1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observation revealed opened food items in the facility's reach in refrigerator and dry storage area which were not dated. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dietary Services Food Handling and Preparation, Dry Storage, dated 08/01/2015, revealed all foods were to be labeled as to content and dated. Observation on 04/12/2022 at 9:03 AM, of the facility's kitchen area revealed the reach in refrigerator had an opened container of beef base flavoring that was approximately half full; however, was not labeled or dated. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Jul 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for medication administration in a total sample of twenty-four (24) residents (Resident #16). Observation of medication administration on 07/19/2023 at 9:18 AM, revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 dropped a white tablet onto Resident #16's left leg. He proceeded to obtain another tablet from the medication cart and he placed a pink tablet in the medicine cup. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 20, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2022Standard3 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Jun 21, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Apr 17, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2014Standard1 finding
  • May 22, 2013—3 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jun 8, 2012—6 findings
  • May 20, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction