Bradley Health Care & Rehab
Cleveland, Tennessee · CCN 445141
13 surveys since 2010, 23 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 23
- Immediate jeopardy
- 20
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 213
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Bradley
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 28, 2026
165 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.42 | 3.56 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.0% | 48.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,999 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G215.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D753.8% | E17.7% | F215.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C17.7% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bradley Health Care & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF744May 28, 2026
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, video surveillance footage review and interview, the facility failed to provide individualized behavioral interventions, and sufficient supervision to prevent wandering, and exit seeking behaviors, for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for behaviors which resulted in actual Harm to Resident #1. The facility's failure to provide sufficient monitoring, supervision, and adequate care plan interventions in response to wandering and exit seeking behaviors, resulted in Resident #1 sustaining fall related injuries during a wandering episode on 4/28/2026. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 27, 2024
Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of the facility investigation, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 resident, (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. The facility's failure to prevent abuse with subsequent injuries of Resident #2 after an assault by Resident #3, resulted in actual Harm of Resident #2. F 600 was cited at a Harm as past non-compliance. The facility is not required to submit additional corrective actions. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 6, 2021
Based on facility policy review, review of the facility Fall Checklist, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their Fall Checklist to complete neurological checks, failed to complete an accurate falls risk assessment, failed to implement a new falls intervention to prevent further falls, and failed to supervise a resident after a fall for 1 resident (#1) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. The facility's failure resulted in Resident #1 sustaining fractures and a laceration to the left side of the forehead, resulting in Harm to Resident #1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550May 28, 2026
Based on review of the facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to remove resident plates and utensils from serving trays, to promote a dignified dining experience for 8 of 8 residents observed in the [NAME] 1 dining room and delayed assistance to 1 dependent resident (Resident #13) for 20 minutes who was seated at the same table as other residents received and finished their meals.The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revealed .It is the practice of this facility to .promote .and treat each resident with respect and dignity .care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances quality of life .Each Resident will be provided equal access to quality of care,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609May 28, 2026
Based on review of the facility abuse policy, review of facility investigations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility reported incidents (FRI) related to allegations of abuse were reported within a timely manner for 4 residents (Residents #1, # 2 #3 and #4) of 11 residents sampled for abuse or neglect.The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure Resident Abuse revealed .When an incident of suspected resident abuse, mistreatment, or neglect is reported the following will occur .The case of suspected abuse will be reported per regulation to the Department of Health by Administrator or Designee .If you have witnessed or have knowledge of such actions in this facility, please give an immediate report to Administration .Resident Abuse May Also Be Reported… […]
Read 40 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 40 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 28, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 27, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2022Standard4 findings
- Aug 6, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 31, 2018Standard5 findings
- Oct 18, 2017Standard and complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Nov 1, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 24, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 19, 2013Standard34 findings · 8 harm
- Oct 24, 2011Standard38 findings · 12 harm
- Aug 18, 2010—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction