Bradford Place Care Center
Hamilton, Ohio · CCN 365277
31 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 129
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 79
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- EXCEPTIONAL LIVING CENTERS
- County
- Butler
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Apr 24, 2026
199 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.23 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.82 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.8% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $135,680 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1754.8% | E929.0% | F412.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bradford Place Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF791Nov 25, 2025
Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 received prompt dental care services. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #19, who had persistent dental pain, developed a dental infection and had significant weight loss. On 06/19/25 at 6:50 P.M., Resident #19, who was nonverbal, screamed loudly for most of the shift due to dental pain and was unable to be redirected. On 06/20/25, Resident #19 ' s oral intake decreased related to ongoing dental pain. Resident #19 was seen by the nursing staff on 06/25/25 for continued behaviors including a decrease in oral intake, biting on her fingers, and was suspected of having a dental infection. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 20, 2023
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess the resident's skin and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until it reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm to Residents #03 and #65 who were at risk for pressure ulcers and the facility found Resident #03's pressure ulcer as an unstageable pressure ulcer (Slough and/or eschar: Known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar) and Resident #65's pressure ulcer as a stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 7, 2022
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, wound nurse interview, policy review and review of information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) the facility failed to accurately assess, measure and document a residents' open sacral wound upon discovery, failed to ensure an individualized care plan was developed to prevent further skin breakdown, failed to complete weekly skin assessments as ordered, failed to implement physician ordered interventions for pressure relieving measures and failed to document a physician order to treat an open sacral wound resulting in an increase in size and discomfort. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Nov 25, 2025
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was served in an appetizing manner. This affected two (Residents #86 and #16) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:15 P.M. of a test tray revealed there were two tacos wrapped in foil with liquid pooled up underneath the plate. There was a significant amount of liquid contained within the foil and the tortilla of the taco was saturated with liquid. Interview on 09/23/25 at 12:16 P.M. with District Manager (DM) #600 verified there was liquid in the foil which altered the texture of the tortillas. Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:25 P.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF807Nov 25, 2025
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure beverage preferences and requests were honored. This affected one (Resident #16) of one residents reviewed for food preferences and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: Observation on 09/22/25 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #525 entered Resident #16's room to deliver a lunch tray. Resident #16 asked CNA #525 for milk. CNA #525 stated there was no milk in the refrigerator, but otherwise she would give it to him. Interview on 09/22/25 at 11:47 A.M. with CNA #525 verified Resident #16 asked for milk and she told him it was not available. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 129 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 24, 2026Complaint6 findings
- Nov 25, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- May 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Feb 16, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Dec 29, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jul 1, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Feb 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2022Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- May 26, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Mar 3, 2021Infection control6 findings
- Jan 27, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Dec 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 31, 2019Complaint6 findings
- Oct 24, 2019Standard6 findings
- May 25, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 2, 2019Complaint7 findings
- Aug 29, 2018Standard13 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 11, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jun 4, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2014Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 1, 2012—11 findings
- Jul 28, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction