Deficiency Index

Bradford Manor Nursing and Rehab

Bradford, Pennsylvania · CCN 395700

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
77
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
115
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HCF MANAGEMENT
County
Mc Kean · rural
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Jul 31, 2025

466 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.803.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.54—
Annual nurse turnover34.5%47.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1376.5%E317.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C15.9%
CMS’s current file: 17 of the 77 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F5751×

    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bradford Manor Nursing and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 30, 2024

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control practices regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs-additional infection control precautions put in place during high contact care activities for individuals who have an increased risk of multi-drug resident organisms [MDROs] or who are colonized/infected with MDROs) for residents with a gastric feeding tube (a medical device used to provide nutrition and/or medications when a person cannot swallow or take anything by mouth) and for residents with indwelling urinary catheters (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R170, R59, R37, R41, R19, and R58). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF740Sep 22, 2023

    Based on review of clinical records and facility documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate behavioral health services/interventions to address behaviors for one of 17 residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the facility's Skilled Nursing Facility Resident Handbook dated 3/2017, reviewed 12/13/22, Code of Conduct section indicated that all residents, family members and visitors should act and behave in a manner that is both respectful of and courteous towards the other residents living in the home as well as towards the staff members who provide care and services to such residents on a daily basis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 22, 2023

    Based on review of a facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of two refrigerators reviewed (Resident Pantry at main nurse's station, B hall). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Food Brought by Family/Visitors dated 12/13/22, indicated all food requiring refrigeration must be dated and labeled with the resident's name. Review of the facility policy entitled Infection Control/Food Safety dated 12/13/22, indicated only resident food items are stored in nutrition services refrigerators. Observation on 9/19/23, at 5:56 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Nov 19, 2021

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that potential safety hazards were secured in kitchen cupboards and drawers and not present in resident rooms for one of four units (dementia unit) and one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R41). Findings include: Observations on 11/16/21, at 2:45 p.m. in the dementia unit's multi-purpose room where residents sit and wait for their meals, eat their meals, play games, color pictures, sit and relax, etc. revealed that two kitchen cupboards and one kitchen drawer were not locked. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Nov 19, 2021

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve palatable food at an appetizing temperature for eight of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R13, R14, R38, R48, R34, R47, R65, and R39). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Food Temperatures dated 12/9/20, revealed that cold foods should be served at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below and hot foods should be served at 135 degrees F or higher. Observations on 11/17/21, at 8:32 a.m. revealed that breakfast was being served on A Hall. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 77 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 31, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Aug 30, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Sep 22, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Oct 21, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Nov 19, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Oct 9, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 8, 2019Standard7 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 23, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Oct 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 4, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Dec 31, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Apr 4, 2013—6 findings
  • Mar 10, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction