Deficiency Index

Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Bowling Green, Kentucky · CCN 185224

26 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
86
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
66
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Warren
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 20, 2025

324 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.633.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.84—
Annual nurse turnover64.4%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 86 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Feb 9, 2021

    Based on interview, closed record review, hospital record review, review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure care plans were developed and implemented to prevent skin breakdown for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility readmitted Resident #1 on [DATE] and care planned the resident for Skin Breakdown. An intervention was initiated that directed staff to assess the resident's skin and report redness, rashes, bruises, abrasions, and skin breakdown. State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #1 reported she identified an area that looked like a bruise above the resident's buttock crack on [DATE] and reported the area to the nurse. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Feb 9, 2021

    Based on interview, closed record review, hospital record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure skin and wound assessments were completed, and pressure ulcers treated according to standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcer development or further decline for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, Resident #1. State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #2 stated when providing incontinent care on [DATE], she noted a discolored area above resident's buttock crack that resembled a bruise. SRNA stated she reported the area to the nurse but could not recall which nurse. However, there was no documented evidence the facility assessed the discolored area on buttocks. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Dec 20, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications, syringes, and lancets were properly secured and supervised on 1 of 4 medication carts.The findings include: A facility policy titled, Safety and Supervision Standard of Practice, revised 02/2021, revealed, Purpose: The facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision are facility-wide priorities. During an observation on 12/17/2025 at 8:02 PM, the surveyor noted a small, plastic, opened top caddy on top of a medication cart outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on the B Hall that contained 10 insulin pens, two bottles of Lantus insulin, one insulin syringe, one cup of alcohol pads, one cup of lancets, and one glucometer. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF637Nov 7, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one of two sampled resident (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for hospice. R4 was admitted to hospice care on 09/16/2024; however, a SCSA MDS had not been completed. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10//2024, specified, 03. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Nov 7, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to take action after receiving a pharmacy recommendation for one of five sampled residents (Resident (R) 6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A facility policy titled, Behavior and Psychoactive Medication Protocol, with a review date of 11/2020, revealed Purpose: The facility strives to enhance the Quality of Life and Quality of Care of residents experiencing behavior and receiving psychoactive medications through the Behavior and Psychoactive Medication review process. Each resident shall receive individualized care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 86 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 20, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 7, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Sep 28, 2017Complaint4 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Jun 8, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 19, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Oct 27, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Feb 22, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2013—7 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 10, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2012—11 findings
  • Jan 26, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2011—2 findings
  • Feb 24, 2011—15 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction