Bolivar Medical Center LTC
Cleveland, Mississippi · CCN 25A188
13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 35
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Bolivar · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 31, 2025
466 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.43 | 4.11 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.77 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.8% | 44.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E— | F240.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bolivar Medical Center LTC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 31, 2025
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure hair restraints were utilized during food preparation to prevent contamination for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include:Review of the facility policy SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL with a revision date of 1/2025, revealed that Team members will wear hair restraints regardless of the length of hair or beard at all times in the kitchen. On 7/30/2025 at 11:00 AM during the kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), an observation was made of Chef #1 preparing food in the kitchen without a hair net in place. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Jul 31, 2025
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for one (1) of two (2) quarters reviewed. (2nd Quarter 2025)Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, “Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal” with a revision date of 6/30/25, revealed, “ .Mandated to submit to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jul 31, 2025
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately for a resident with a Mental Illness for one (1) of the 22 sampled residents. Resident #19 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled “Nursing Assessment and Interdisciplinary Care Plan,” with a revision date of 06/2023, revealed: 2. Long Term Care Facility will conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment upon admission and at regular intervals to ensure that each resident meet his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psycho-social functioning: Physical and mental functional status . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Oct 12, 2022
Based on staff interview, resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)s for a dependent resident, as evidence of long, rough fingernails, for 1 (one) of 22 residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident #18 Findings include: A review of the facility policy, with an effective date of 03/2021, titled, Nursing Assessment and Interdisciplinary Care Plan under purpose; The purpose is to ensure resident's assessments will be performed by Registered Nurse and that all State and Federal regulations are implemented for MDS+. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Oct 12, 2022
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident #18 Findings include: The facility does not have a policy related to nail care. An observation and interview, on 10/10/22 at 11:03 AM of Resident # 18 revealed he had long and jaggad fingernails with a brown substance underneath them on his right hand. An observation of Resident # 18 on 10/11/22 at 9:25 AM revealed the resident had long jagged fingernails with a brown substance under them on his right hand. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 31, 2025Standard3 findings
- Oct 12, 2022Standard2 findings
- Sep 30, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 19, 2019Standard2 findings
- Sep 26, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jul 14, 2017Standard6 findings
- Sep 29, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jan 6, 2016Complaint5 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Aug 21, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jul 10, 2014Standard2 findings
- Aug 16, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 9, 2012—6 findings
- Nov 22, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction