Deficiency Index

Bledsoe County Nursing Home

Pikeville, Tennessee · CCN 44E480

2 surveys since 2023, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
10
Surveys
2
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2023–2026
’23’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Citations on record10

Across 2 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Bledsoe · rural
Medicare-certified since
2023

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 7, 2026

186 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.264.48
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.37—
Annual nurse turnover46.2%46.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD583.3%E116.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 10 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bledsoe County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641May 7, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 (Residents #3, #6, #12, and #23) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings included:A facility policy titled, MDS Assessment Coordinator, revised 11/2019, indicated, 3. Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment (MDS) must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment by: a. dating and signing the assessment (MDS); and b. identifying each section completed. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #23 on 08/02/2009. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698May 7, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order and a care plan for dialysis for 1 (Resident #18) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Hemodialysis, implemented 07/30/2021, revealed, The facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis. Per the policy, 12. The facility will ensure that the physician's orders for dialysis include: a. The type of access for dialysis and location; b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Aug 8, 2023

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (#15) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Record review of the most recent PASARR Level 1 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had a mental health diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Aug 8, 2023

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (#15) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Record review of the most recent PASARR Level 1 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had a mental health diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Aug 8, 2023

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Physician reviewed and acted upon irregularities identified by the Consultant Pharmacist for 2 residents (#30 an #32) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Regimen Reviews, revised 5/2019 revealed .The Consultant Pharmacist provides the Director of Nursing Services and Medical Director with a written, signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports .Copies of medication regimen review reports, including physician responses, are maintained as part of the permanent medical record . […]

Read all 10 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 7, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Aug 8, 2023Standard8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction