Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Tacoma, Washington · CCN 505289
52 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 231
- Surveys
- 52
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Pierce
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.74 | 3.98 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.65 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.7% | 47.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $19,656 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G33.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4253.8% | E2734.6% | F33.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B22.6% | C11.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6846×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6105×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Aug 27, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement key components of an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to use personal protective equipment (PPE) while entering the rooms of residents on transmission-based precautions (TBP) and failing to disinfect shared resident equipment between use by residents on TBP in one of four halls (400 Hall) reviewed for infection control. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for two of two residents (Residents 58 and 145) reviewed for urinary catheters. These failures placed residents and staff at risk of potential exposure to COVID-19, increased the likelihood of serious harm or death, increased chance of infection and a diminished quality of life. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 26, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, identify fall trends and implement progressive resident centered interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 6) reviewed for falls. Resident 6, who had 5 falls since [DATE] and a decline in their strength/condition, experienced harm when they fell and broke their ankle that required transfer to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. This failure placed residents at risk of repeated falls and injuries.Findings included.Review of the facility Falls and Fall Risk Management policy, dated [DATE], showed staff would identify interventions related to residents' specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling.Review of… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF690Mar 26, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) were assessed for complications associated with indwelling urinary catheters. Failure of the facility to coordinate with urology and monitor for urinary retention following catheter removal, resulted in harm to Resident 1 when they experienced prolonged pain and discomfort as evidenced by crying out and a change in level of consciousness. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 22, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take timely action for 1 of 3 who experienced a significant change in their baseline condition. Resident 1 experienced harm when the serious changes in cognition, blood pressure and temperature were not addressed timely, and they had to eventually be hospitalized . Findings included . The facility's Fall Management Guideline, dated 05/10/2023, documented facility staff would identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling, and to try to minimize complications from falling. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 27, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from accident hazards for two of six residents (Residents 38 and 443) reviewed for accidents. Failure to identify/address all risk factors and ensure care planned interventions implemented to provide supervision and assistance were consistently provided resulted in harm when Resident 38 had multiple falls that resulted in fractures to the right foot and Resident 443 experienced a right hip/femur fracture after falling on 08/08/2021. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, avoidable injuries, and diminished quality of life. […]
Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 231 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Complaint3 findings
- May 6, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 13, 2026Standard19 findings
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
Show the 44 earlier surveys
- Mar 14, 2025Standard24 findings
- Nov 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2024Complaint3 findings
- May 23, 2024Standard14 findings
- Mar 22, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 26, 2023Standard and complaint15 findings
- Feb 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 27, 2021Standard and complaint20 findings · 2 harm
- May 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Dec 16, 2019Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 13, 2019Complaint7 findings
- May 22, 2019Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 15, 2019Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 16, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Sep 28, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Sep 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Aug 21, 2018Complaint6 findings
- Jun 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 12, 2018Standard8 findings
- Oct 20, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Apr 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 24, 2017Standard7 findings
- Nov 4, 2016Complaint8 findings · 7 harm
- Sep 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Feb 5, 2016Standard2 findings
- Feb 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jan 27, 2015Standard4 findings
- May 19, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Feb 7, 2014—7 findings
- May 9, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 21, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 28, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 27, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 6, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 23, 2011—2 findings
- Jul 3, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction