Deficiency Index

Bethesda Home

Webster, South Dakota · CCN 435071

10 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Day · rural
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 15, 2026

208 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.533.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover30.6%49.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD337.5%E562.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethesda Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Apr 15, 2026

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff educated the resident or the resident's representative of the risks versus benefits of medications or of alternative treatments to make an informed decision for the consent for the use of psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) before they were administered to three of three sampled residents (1, 12, and 25). Findings include:1. Review of resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His 2/11/26 Brief Interview Status (BIMS) assessment score was 10, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Jan 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure practices were in place to ensure the residents' right to privacy for six of six (1, 12, 20, 25, 37, and 42) sampled residents with audio and video monitoring devices in their rooms. *Obtain consent for audio and video monitoring use for six of six (1, 12, 20, 25, 37, and 42) sampled residents with audio and video monitoring devices in their rooms. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/7/25 at 2:18 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jan 9, 2025

    Based on interview, observation, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to implement an effective grievance process to ensure two of two sampled residents (10 and 32) who had reported grievances included documentation, investigation, and follow-up with the resident regarding issues of resident care and quality of life that were important to the resident. Specifically, the provider failed to ensure the following: *All written grievance decisions included the date that the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concern(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jan 9, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to maintain the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing by ensuring staff promptly respond to call lights for five of five residents (2, 10, 17, 32, and 35) who used call lights to alert staff of their assistance needs. Findings include: 1. Interview on 1/7/25 at 9:03 a.m. with resident 35 revealed: *She stated she had to wait too long for her call light to be answered. -It took up to 45 minutes for the call light to be answered, usually it was one-half hour, and seldom was it 15 minutes or less. -The wait time was especially worse in the mornings. *She needed help to get dressed and undressed. -She did not need assistance to use the bathroom. 2. Interview on 1/7/25 at 9:09 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene were performed during two of three meal services by two of three observed dietary cooks (D and E) in the dining room. Findings include: 1. Observation on 9/12/23 from 7:54 a.m. through 8:28 a.m. with cook D revealed she: *Was wearing gloves while serving breakfast from the steam table in the dining room. *Took a resident's menu card from the card rack on the steam table and placed it next to a plate. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 15, 2026Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jan 9, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Aug 9, 2017Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2014Standard9 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jul 10, 2013—7 findings
  • Jul 25, 2012—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction