Deficiency Index

Bethany Home

Dubuque, Iowa · CCN 165584

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
28
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
66
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Dubuque
Medicare-certified since
2009

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2026

144 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.504.05
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.88—
Annual nurse turnover32.1%41.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$13,065 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG133.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 28 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethany Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Dec 14, 2021

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to implement safety interventions to prevent an elopement for 1 of 12 residents sampled (Resident #43) for supervision. The resident had a history of leaving the unit without staff knowledge. The resident exited the second floor elevator and then exited the ground floor ambulance door without staff knowledge. Staff F found Resident #43 in his pajamas, bath robe, and slippers on the street behind the facility. Resident #43 stated he was lost. The failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility identified 17 residents as independently mobile and cognitively impaired. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 18, 2026

    Based on observation, clinical record review, document review, procedure review, manufacturer use manual, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) locked wheelchair brakes during pivot and full body mechanical lift transfers for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #23). This failure resulted in Resident #23 falling and sustaining a left ulna fracture (a break in the ulna is one of the two long bones in the forearm (running along the pinky-finger side). The facility identified a census of 63 residents.Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #23 exhibited a long/short memory problem, and had severely impaired daily decision-making ability. Resident #23 did not exhibit behaviors. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation, resident record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications in a means that care and medication administration services had been provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice within a locked Memory Care Unit and secondly after a resident had received an ophthalmology procedure and returned to the facility with new orders. The facility reported a census of 67. Findings include: 1. A continuous observation had taken place on 3/28/23 from 8:14 AM to 8:20 AM. On 3/28/23 at 8:14 AM the dietary staff entered the Memory Care Unit with the steamer cart server to provide residents breakfast. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to have dietary male staff wear beard restraints, according to the current standards of practice per the Food Code of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), food service staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnet, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food while they were working in the kitchen to prevent hair from contacting food while cooking, preparing and assembling food for all facility residents. The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: On 3/27/23 at 9:28 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager. During observations the Dietary Manager introduced a male cook, Staff A, who wore a hairnet and facial mask however no beard restraint. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Dec 14, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications within professional standards for 1 of 12 residents observed (Resident #24) during medication administration. The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: Observation during medication pass on 12/7/21 at 12:24 PM, Staff I, Certified Medication Aide, placed Resident #24's medication cup on his/her tray table. The medication cup contained [MEDICATION(S)] 40 mg and Dairy Relief 3000 units. Staff I stated she was going to lunch and would have Staff J check on the resident to make sure she took her medications as she likes to take them with food. Staff I exited Resident #24's room at 12:33 PM and closed the door. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 28 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2026Standard and complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 30, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 31, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Aug 9, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 24, 2017Standard1 finding
  • May 12, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2015Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • May 26, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 14, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 9, 2012—9 findings
  • Apr 8, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction