Beth Haven Nursing Home
Hannibal, Missouri · CCN 265108
30 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 178
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 105
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Marion · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 30, 2025
497 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.61 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.16 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $38,632 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
- Special focus
- SFF Candidate
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.2% | K22.5% | L— |
| Actual harm | G22.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3037.0% | E3745.7% | F67.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.2% | C22.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Beth Haven Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF584Jun 30, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment by not maintaining the indoor air temperatures of resident rooms in the facility between 71.0 F. (degrees Fahrenheit) and 81.0 F. for 19 sampled residents on the east wing of the facility (Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22 and #23) with room temperatures ranging from 82.0 degrees Fahrenheit ( F.) to 90 F. The facility failed to have a comprehensive monitoring system including documentation of resident room temperatures and each resident's condition. The facility census was 69.The Administrator was notified on 6/23/25 at 5:15 P.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 6/23/25. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600May 2, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents on the facility special care unit, including four residents (Resident #54, #59, #500 and #501), in a review of thirteen sampled residents, from verbal and sexual abuse by one resident (Resident #68). Resident #68 had a history of verbal and physical sexually inappropriate behavior. The resident exhibited inappropriate sexual behavior towards other residents on the unit which included touching or attempts to touch their bodies with his/her hands or mouth in a sexual manner and made sexual comments toward them. Resident #501, a cognitively intact resident, experienced psychosocial distress due to interactions with Resident #68 when the resident made him/her feel sexually harassed and mentally abused. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600May 2, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents on the facility special care unit, including four residents (Resident #54, #59, #500 and #501), in a review of thirteen sampled residents, from verbal and sexual abuse by one resident (Resident #68). Resident #68 had a history of verbal and physical sexually inappropriate behavior. The resident exhibited inappropriate sexual behavior towards other residents on the unit which included touching or attempts to touch their bodies with his/her hands or mouth in a sexual manner and made sexual comments toward them. Resident #501, a cognitively intact resident, experienced psychosocial distress due to interactions with Resident #68 when the resident made him/her feel sexually harassed and mentally abused. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF678Nov 10, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, a procedure to support and maintain breathing and circulation for a person who has stopped breathing and/or whose heart has stopped) for one resident (Resident #1) identified as having a full code status (CPR required in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). Staff found the resident unresponsive and without a pulse or respirations on [DATE] and failed to initiate CPR and call 911. The resident expired at the facility. The facility also failed to implement the facility policy addressing CPR requirements for staff and to monitor to ensure CPR certified staff were scheduled and present in the facility 24 hours a day, seven days a week. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684May 2, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to identify signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (an excess of glucose in the bloodstream) on 4/25/23 for one resident, (Resident #32), who had a diagnosis of diabetes, when the resident presented with shaking and excessive thirst. The resident's care plan instructed staff to be alert to signs of high blood sugar and contact the physician as indicated. Facility staff did not check the resident's blood sugar or call the resident's physician to report the noted signs and symptoms. On the morning of 4/26/23, the facility failed to obtain a fasting blood sugar as ordered. On the afternoon of 4/26/23, the facility notified the resident's physician the resident had become lethargic, unresponsive and pale. […]
Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 178 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 30, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2025Standard28 findings
- Oct 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jun 14, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Apr 23, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- May 2, 2023Standard32 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 4, 2022Complaint6 findings
- Sep 2, 2022Complaint6 findings
- Jun 28, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Mar 30, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 10, 2021Complaint5 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 28, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Nov 20, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 12, 2019Standard17 findings · 3 harm
- May 23, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Aug 16, 2018Standard10 findings
- Oct 26, 2017Standard8 findings
- Aug 25, 2016Standard9 findings
- Mar 10, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 11, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Oct 16, 2014Standard8 findings
- Aug 22, 2013—2 findings
- Jun 21, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 12, 2012—3 findings
- Sep 9, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction