Deficiency Index

Bergen New Bridge Medical Center

Paramus, New Jersey · CCN 315017

23 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
95
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
574
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Bergen
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 184 facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Nov 18, 2025

356 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.884.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.08—
Annual nurse turnover15.8%30.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG16.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1173.3%E16.7%F213.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 15 of the 95 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6581×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bergen New Bridge Medical Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 6, 2023

    C #NJ159085 C #NJ158716 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility post fall procedure to ensure appropriate care was provided and there was no delay in treatment and ensure: a.) a supervisor was notified, b.) a physical assessment was completed and documented, c.) the physician was notified, and d.) the fall incident was documented in the medical record. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 34 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #168) who had a history of falls, including a fall with a shoulder fracture on 11/30/21, and who sustained an unwitnessed fall when a noise was heard in Resident #168's room on 01/22/23 at 10:35 PM, and the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 7, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain kitchen sanitation in a manner intended to prevent the spread of food borne illness and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice could affect all residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/3/26 at 5:46 PM, the surveyor conducted a kitchen tour with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following concerns:1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) sanitize and air-dry steam table pans correctly to prevent microbial growth, b) follow labeling requirements on food products and use-by dates, and c) maintain food and supply storage. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 at 9:45 AM, in the presence of the Operations Managers (OM #1 and # 2) and Executive Administrator (EA), the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the dishwashing area, the surveyor observed 42 steam table pans wet nested as they were stacked with pooling water between them. The surveyor interviewed the Food Service Worker (FSW), who stated, In the morning we stack the pans. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF919May 16, 2025

    Complaint NJ # 169798 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the devices used to identify call bell notifications were functioning properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in Unit 8-7. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/12/25 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor upon exit from the elevator, the surveyor observed unit 8-7's call light system machine in the nursing station had a red button on with no audible sounds. There were five staff in the nursing station including the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM). Afterward, the surveyor went to left wing side of Unit 8-7. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Aug 7, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 8 of 35 sampled residents (Residents #1, #5, #6, #7, #8, #262, #282, and #350) and 13 of 13 unsampled residents (Unsampled Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14) medical information were maintained in a manner that residents' privacy were not visible to all other residents, visitors, and staff, for 2 of 4 nursing units (Building 11-6 and Building 6-3) observed in their survey results binders. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 95 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2026Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Nov 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 6, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Nov 20, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2018Standard1 finding
  • May 9, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 26, 2016Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 6, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2014—6 findings
  • Dec 3, 2012—9 findings
  • Aug 30, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 16, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 29, 2011—2 findings
  • Oct 6, 2011—7 findings
  • Aug 31, 2010—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction