Deficiency Index

Bedford Alzheimer's Care Center

Hattiesburg, Mississippi · CCN 25A416

7 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
16
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/7

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Forrest
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 7, 2024

977 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.614.11
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover53.8%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$66,700 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H266.7%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E—F133.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 16 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bedford Alzheimer's Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, patternF600Dec 28, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for four (4) of seven (7) sampled residents. Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4. Resident #1 was initiated physical altercations on 12/9/23 and 12/19/23 which resulted in: a. Resident #1 receiving bruising and a skin tear. b. Resident #2 receiving bruising and skin discoloration under the right eye. c. Resident #3 receiving redness to her cheek. d. Resident #4 receiving bruising, skin tears, and a hematoma. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Abuse Prevention Program, undated, revealed Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . […]

  • Actual harm, patternF655Dec 28, 2023

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours that addressed safety concerns, identified the resident's need for supervision, or included behavioral interventions for a resident with behavioral aggression, for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents. Resident #1. Resident #1 was involved in a physical altercations on 12/9/23 and 12/19/23 which resulted in: a. Resident #2 receiving bruising and skin discoloration under the right eye and bleeding to the right middle finger and chin area. b. Resident #3 receiving redness to her cheek. c. Resident #4 receiving bruising, skin tears, and a hematoma. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Baseline Care Plan, revised 11/06/23 revealed . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 7, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that foods were stored safely by leaving food opened and exposed on the self, not dating foods with a use-by date, storing foods without an identifying label, and not discarding food items after their use-by date for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, Food Safety Requirements, revised [DATE], revealed, .Foods will be stored, in accordance with professional standards for service safety. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3. c. iv. Labeling, dating and monitoring refrigerated food .so it is used by its use-by date .discarded, and .v. […]

Read all 16 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 7, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 3, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Mar 16, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jul 31, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 10, 2012—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction