Beaver County Nursing Home
Beaver, Oklahoma · CCN 375559
14 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 68
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Beaver · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 59 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Dec 12, 2024
697 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.63 | 3.83 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 66.7% | 52.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,642 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J17.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D538.5% | E646.2% | F17.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Beaver County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 12, 2024
An IJ was identified from 12/11/24 through 12/12/24. The deficient practice remained at isolated level of a potential for harm. On 12/11/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to implement fall interventions for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk. On 12/10/24, Resident #13 had a fall with injury in their room. Resident #13 fell during an independent transfer and was found by staff on the floor with their left foot rotated outward with no range of motion to left hip. Resident #13 was taken to the ER by staff. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 21, 2022
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to: a. ensure temperatures were obtained and foods were held at 135 degrees on the holding table, and b. ensure dishes and utensils were cleaned/sanitized to prevent food borne illness. The Administrator identified 40 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: A policy titled, Food Temperatures, review date [DATE], read in part, . Ensure food is served at a safe temperature to prevent food-borne illness .Hot Foods should be maintained at a minimum of 135 degrees F . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Dec 12, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were individualized and revised after a fall for residents assessed as a high risk for falls for two (#13 and #15) of two sampled residents reviewed for individualized care plans. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility Findings: An undated facility Accidents policy, read in part, The intent of this policy is to ensure this facility provides an environment that is free from accidents hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision and assistive devices are provided for each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. This includes: a. Identifying hazards and risk, b. Evaluating and analyzing hazards and risk, c. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Dec 12, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Report, dated 07/01/24 through 09/30/24, did not document any RN hours for 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/12/24, and 07/13/24. A Nurses Schedule, dated July 2024, were reviewed and schedule did not document RN coverage for 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/13/24, and 07/14/24. On 12/11/24 at 11:03 a.m., the administrator was asked what the facility policy for staffing an RN eight hours a day seven days a week. They stated the facility should have RN coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Dec 12, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed during the medication pass with two errors identified. The total medication error rate was 8% related to two medications held without physician orders for parameters to hold medications for one (#11) of three sampled residents observed during medication pass. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 68 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 12, 2024Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 21, 2022Standard5 findings
- May 18, 2021Standard11 findings
- Nov 17, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Sep 25, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jun 18, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Mar 25, 2019Standard8 findings
- Feb 15, 2018Standard4 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Dec 15, 2016Standard4 findings
- Nov 4, 2015Standard7 findings
- Dec 23, 2014Standard1 finding
- Nov 25, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Oct 9, 2014Standard8 findings
- Nov 21, 2013Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction