Deficiency Index

Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC

Alameda, California · CCN 056348

63 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
176
Surveys
63
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file49/63

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
180
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DAVID JOHNSON
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 10, 2026

122 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.854.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover21.6%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$216,834 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ25.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2155.3%E923.7%F615.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 38 of the 176 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6982×

    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 15, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect two of ten sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3), and one visitor (Visitor 1, family member of Resident 7), from abuse when:Resident 1 fondled the genitals of Resident 2 on 5/24/26.Resident 1 hit the arm of Resident 3 on 6/4/26.The facility relocated Resident 1 to the same unit as Resident 2 after an alleged sexual assault by Resident 1 to Resident 2 on 6/5/26.The facility placed Resident 1 in a room with two vulnerable residents (Resident 9 and Resident 10) on 6/10/26.Additionally, R1 displayed physical aggression towards an unrelated Visitor on 6/4/26. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610May 16, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents in the facility from physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) deliberately poked one resident (Resident 1) in the right cheek, smacked Resident 1 in the hand and then forced Resident 1 down in her wheelchair causing Resident 1 to cry out. The facility failed to protect 16 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) assigned to CNA1, from possible physical abuse when the Administrator (ADM) returned CNA1 to direct care duty before completion of a thorough abuse investigation, including interviewing all witnesses. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF609Jun 15, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, investigate, and report one sexual assault allegation within two hours of incident notification and one abuse allegation within 24 hours of incident notification to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and the Ombudsman for two of ten sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3).This failure resulted in one allegation of physical abuse and one allegation of sexual abuse going uninvestigated and unreported resulting in emotional harm to Resident 2 and Resident 3, in addition to the potential for physical and/or emotional harm to other vulnerable residents.During a review of the AR for Resident 1 printed on 6/10/26, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jun 24, 2021

    The facility failed to ensure the competency of the Dietary Manager (DM) when: 1. the DM did not ensure the cleanliness and maintenence of equipment in the kitchen (Cross-reference F812 and F908); and 2. the DM did not adequately oversee the safe cooling of meat. This failure to maintain equipment and a clean kitchen environment had the potential to result in cross-contamination of food and lead to foodborne illness for 129 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 141. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Jun 24, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of Food and Nutrition Services staff when: 1. Dietary Cook 1 (DC1) did not correctly date thawing chicken stored in a refrigerator; and 2. DC1 and Dietary Cook 2 (DC2) did not follow standardized recipes when preparing food. The failure to ensure staff competency for food related tasks had the potential to cause contamination of food resulting in food borne illness; provide food for residents which did not meet the nutrients according to the planned menu resulting in nutritional related medical issues; and provide food to residents with an inappropriate texture for medical needs resulting in choking or death for 129 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 141. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 176 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 10, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 15, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Sep 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 55 earlier surveys
  • Jul 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2021Standard13 findings
  • Feb 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Feb 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 12, 2016Standard24 findings
  • Jan 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 3, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • May 30, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 26, 2013—1 finding
  • May 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2012—7 findings
  • Apr 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2011—25 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 30, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction