Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, Llc

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, Llc, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Aug 4, 2026

  Complaint #: 2990897 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 08/04/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document in the medical record wound care provided to a resident with pressure ulcers (PUs) (injuries to skin and the tissue below due to pressure on the skin for a long time) to their and heels and lower back and a skin tear to their arm (Resident #1), and to a resident with PUs to their lower back and heels (Resident #2). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for wound care.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Apr 23, 2025

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure; a.) physicians' orders and approved plan of care were followed, b.) provider's (consultant) recommendation was followed through for 1 of 17 residents, (Resident #27), from March 2024 through April 2025, for a total of 13 months, and c.) routine Braden scale assessment was done for residents with history of facility acquired wounds, for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #27), reviewed for pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Apr 23, 2025

  Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a residents' advance directives for 2 of 3 residents, (Resident #15, Resident #16) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (electronic and paper) medical records of Resident #15, which revealed: A review of the Admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and hypertension (high blood pressure). […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Apr 23, 2025

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike setting. This deficient practice was identified in dining room for 2 of 5 days observation, and was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/25 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed the dining room (and recreation area) with no residents inside the room. The surveyor observed the floor with accumulation of grayish and blackish substances, pieces of small plastic wrapper and paper, and the tv (television) with accumulation of grayish substances. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF624Apr 23, 2025

  NJ#168277 Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to resident to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #212), reviewed for discharge. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) for Resident #212. A review of Resident #212's admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited vertebral disc displacement (when a disc in the spine shifts and may cause pain) and difficulty walking. […]